1) When it comes to Shakespeare our truncated attention spans might make it difficult to understand the complex structure and language within his work.
2) A contemporary of Shakespeare's may have understood the language in his works because they lived at the same time as him.
3) Many readers like the phantasmagoric scenes in Shakespeare's plays because they are dreamlike or surreal.
4) We get a vicarious thrill out of reading fiction because it provides us with imagined interpretations.
Out of all given option, "Evan wanted nothing more than to cook for his friends and family", the sentence contains a particle.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
A particle refers the word which possesses grammatical functionality but would not match the main parts (i.e. adverb, verb and noun). The particles will not vary. For example, “To” an infinitive with verb as “to fly” is an example for particle, even it acts as a preposition, like "I am going to America next week."
Many words described as particles, e.g. Sayings such as "but" and "and", and pronunciations such as "oh" and "wow". Particles often occur when teaching phrasal verbs that can be grouped by particle for educational purposes, such as Off, On, and more. According to the above detail, concluding that sentence in option C would be the right answer.
He can't face that he has a problem, he needs help but ignores it
Archilles is too ignorant
I think it is A. was waving at the flag. This is just my opinion is I may be wrong. Please feel free to correct me in the comments. Have a nice day!
