Answer:
The correct option is (c)
Explanation:
A leader who displays directing leader style gives particular instructions to the subordinates and clearly defines roles and tasks assigned to them. He supervises the tasks performed by the subordinates.
The leader makes all decisions and communicate the same to the subordinates so it is a one-way communication as he does not seek feedback from the them.
Here, Barney displays directing leader style as he is more task oriented and not relationship oriented. He has clearly stated the tasks and deadlines to the subordinates.
Answer:
c. $94,400
Explanation:
Net cash provided or used by operating activities is computed as see below;
Net cash provided or used by operating activities = Net income + Depreciation expense - Gain on sale of land - Increase in merchandise inventory + Increase in accounts payable
Net cash provided or used by operating activities = $85,800 + $12,500 - $8,000 - $2,550 + $6,650
Net cash provided or used by operating activities = $94,400
Answer:
Since Will is getting the custody of their two children, he can claim them as dependents and deduct exemptions when he files his taxes.
- child tax credit ($2,000 per child under 18)
- child and dependent tax credit (up to $3,000 per child under 13 and $500 for dependent over 13)
- American opportunity education credit (up to $2,500 per child that studies x 4 years maximum)
Alimony can no longer be deducted from Janine's AGI, nor it should be included in Will's AGI.
Property distributions (cars and house) will not have any effect in their taxes, but if they sell them, their basis will be the value at the time of divorce.
We use $37,500 as a basis of sales per year for the two companies for Julie. <span>. When the two companies are equated, 30,000 + 0.03*x = 25,000 + 0.05*x where x is equal to $250,000 as total sales that equates both. This means, sales below this $250,000 line has lower pay than the other. </span>
This is a territorial restriction.
It even says in the text - territorial restriction refers to when a certain company forbids another company to sell its products in a certain location, because it will interfere with the first company's profits. The same thing happened here, because they don't want any competition on the market.
