Answer:
The government should not go ahead with this plan.
Explanation:
If the government decides to proceed with its plan to pass a law that authorizes the management of a hospital to force people who refuse to wash their hands out of a hospital and deny them medical care against their will, then the government will be infringing on people's right to life. While it is necessary to prevent the spread of Clostridium Difficile (C. difficile) , any law that is made to that effect must not abuse the right of access to medical care which is a fundamental right of citizens. This action will be ethically incorrect because it amounts to a government using a high handed approach in discharging its duties.
However, the intention of such a law is to protect the citizenry from the bacteria Clostridium Difficile (C. difficile) . If such a law is not passed, more people may become infected by the bacteria owing to the carelessness of other people. This situation is made worse because the organism is resistant to antibiotics.
However, since prevention of the spread of Clostridium Difficile (C. difficile) is Paramount, I opine that the government should continue to enlighten citizens and appeal to them on the need to practice regular hand washing in order to protect themselves and other people. Passing the said law is a draconian approach to the problem hence it is not in line with the ethics of modern civilization.
It is more civil to continue to appeal to citizens and sensitize them on the importance of regular hand washing as it affects the spread of Clostridium Difficile (C. difficile) .
If the client is experiencing nausea
and vomiting, diarrhea, thirst, polyuria, slurred speech, and muscle weakness,
then the most appropriate nursing intervention would be withholding the next
dose of lithium and drawing blood to test it for toxicity to avoid worsening
the client’s condition.
To add, the variety of
toxicities wherein some substances may give rise causes of harm to the entire
body, hazard to specific organs, major/minor damage, or cause cancer are called
health hazards. Anything falling outside of the definition cannot be
classified as that type of toxicant.<span> In treating schizophrenia,
impulse control disorders, depression, eating disorders and certain mental illnesses
in kids, lithium is used for them.</span>
Complete answer:
You will find the table that provides data about the two species in the attached files.
Answer:
Because in the table provided you can see that, even when both species can use the same resources, certain vegetable species are eaten only by buffalo and not by cattle, while some other plants are eaten by cattle and not by buffalo.
Explanation:
The realized niche refers to the restricted conditions in which a species can live and survive as a result of environmental physic characteristics and the <u>interaction with other species</u>.
The competitive exclusion principle establishes that two or more species that share the same niche requirements and are in biological competition for the same resources, won´t be able to coexist indefinitely in the same space if the other ecological factors are constant. When the superior competitor occupies entirely the inferior competitor´s fundamental niche, the superior species has advantages over the other species and monopolizes all the resources. At this point, the inferior species is displaced and must adapt to use other resources changing its behavior, or must migrate to another area where it can get access to its needs, or get extinct.
Resources partitioning refers to one dominant species monopolizing the resources, and the other inferior species use other resources -partially or completely-, migrate or get extinguished. A way in which species can divide resources is by living in different habitat areas. These species might eat the same food, and can roost in different places within the habitat. This resource partitioning and differentiation in the function of their physical location allows both species to coexist more effectively.
In the exposed example, cattle and buffalo share the same fundamental niche, meaning that both of them can consume the same vegetable species, although in some cases, cattle eat certain species that buffalo does not, and vice-versa. Probably it occurred <u>resource partitioning</u> between these species, reflected in the fact that buffalo feeds on some species, while cattle feed on some other species.