1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Licemer1 [7]
3 years ago
12

Explain how the Sikhs became a martial sect and why they came to dislike the Muslims.

History
1 answer:
Gnesinka [82]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The Sikhs become a Martial Sect ever since the death of Guru Har Krishan causing the Sikhs to lose trust in different communities.

Explanation:

Sikh communities came together during the period of Guru Har Krishans death and some coronation. With some sects of Sikhism they believe in an lineage of Gurus or believe in following a living guru. The main religions of the area at the time were Hinduism and Islam. The Sikh faith began around 1500 CE, when Guru Nanak began teaching a faith that was quite distinct from Hinduism and Islam. The different beliefs all happened because of a different teacher. I believe that the Sikhs began to hate the muslims because of their different beliefs.

You might be interested in
Which is an example of a civilian? 1 point A. a police officer at a concentration camp B. an Allied soldier C. a Nazi soldier D.
MA_775_DIABLO [31]

The civilian here is

D. Zoltán Farkas

Explanation:

In general the people whoa re working for and with the government and the army are not considered to be civilians.

The civilians are the ones that are not in stake of the government the police or the army and are not involved in the work of the state directly.

Thus, only the last options is left as that is a name of a person which can be lathered to a lot of people that is not clear who it is of.

But as it is a singular person that is to be a citizen and not other groups as they are not civilian.

4 0
3 years ago
Question 5 (30 points)
sergejj [24]

Between the late 1940s and the early 1990s, the Cold War era drastically changed Europe. The nations of Europe would have undoubtedly altered over that time, but without the consequences and influence of the Cold War, the changes would not have been as significant. Following the devastation of World War Two, the US provided billions of dollars in economic assistance that helped revive Western Europe under the Marshall plan. However, since countries who took Marshall assistance promised to share economic plans and utilize the cash to buy American goods, the USA's true goal was to solidify its dominance in Europe. Additionally, the rising popularity of communism in Western Europe was weakened by this increased riches. For instance, in France, the communist party had an estimated 1 million members by 1949.

But since the Soviet Union prevented countries in its zone of influence from accepting Marshall Plan help, the Marshall Plan exposed the first serious rift in Europe. Although they provided comparable assistance, it was insufficient, and Eastern Europe's economy started to deteriorate as a result. The two superpowers also designated their respective territories. Both Hungary and Czechoslovakia organized rallies and uprisings against communist government, and in each instance, the USSR ruthlessly suppressed them. It's conceivable that the UN would have adopted a more direct strategy, similar to what was seen in Korea, if the tension and threat of the cold war hadn't existed. However, in Europe, such an intervention was improbable.

Germany was split into the east (the GDR) and west (the FRG) for the duration of the Cold War, and some Germans still sense this division even now, over 40 years after reunification. The Cold War was such a huge and dramatic struggle that it is possible to argue that it influenced how the 21st century looks now. The impacts of it have not only been felt in Europe but also across the world over the past 20 years. Everything was impacted by the Cold War.

4 0
2 years ago
Which of the following is the most appropriate response to the statement “The Qin dynasty was bad for China”? a. “That is true,
Bumek [7]

Answer:

D. “That is incorrect. The dynasty strengthened and unified China.”

Explanation:

The Qin dynasty (221 a.c. - 206 a.c.) unified China under the hand of Zheng, the young king of the Qin state, and his prime-minister Li Si. Zheng conquered the feudal states of Zhao, Wei, Chu, Yan, and Qi and adopted the name Qin Shi Huangdi meaning "First Emperor".  Shi Huangdi was violent, unpopular and considered an autocratic tyrant, his government was bureaucratic and legalist, opposed to Confucio´s predicaments. However, important buildings such as the first part of the Great Wall of China and the terracotta warriors (found in Shi Huangdi´s tomb) belong to this period.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the loss of New Orleans impact the Confederacy?
barxatty [35]

Answer:

The loss of New Orleans affected the Confederacy because.

They were no longer able to use the Mississippi River to import and export supplies. Also the blockade made it even harder to import things like food ammo and guns also making the confederacy low on man power

i hope this helps

5 0
3 years ago
Dose anyone know about this
Y_Kistochka [10]
Dose anyone know about what?
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What economic activity was the thread that intertwined Americans in the 5 points
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE QUICK ANSWER
    13·1 answer
  • Most people in southern europe live far front the sea true or false?
    14·2 answers
  • The Legislative Branch has the power to approve international treaties negotiated by the Executive Branch. This is an example of
    5·1 answer
  • Which level of government has the greatest level of responsibility for keeping track
    14·1 answer
  • Which animals did Europeans bring to the Americas?
    13·1 answer
  • Which region of Virginia would be most affected by restrictions on travel?
    7·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of government? Select a quotation from a US president. Then, write an argumentative essay that explains why
    15·1 answer
  • How did general George Washington support the American forces at Saratoga
    6·1 answer
  • all of the following statements about du halde are factually accurate. which would most likely lead historians to question the o
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!