1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andru [333]
3 years ago
8

tawag sa pamumuhay na kagawian ng maraming pangkat ng tao kasama na rito ang kanilang wika,kaugalian,paniniwala,at sining​

History
1 answer:
joja [24]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: nose wey

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Devohn doing his model of human settlement perishable items like fruit and milk would be produced in the rain
zlopas [31]
Perishable items are produced in the second ring of the von thunen model.
4 0
4 years ago
When is the only time a new justice may be appointed?
Usimov [2.4K]

The appointment and confirmation of Justices to the Supreme Court of the United States involves several steps set forth by the United States Constitution, which have been further refined and developed by decades of tradition. Candidates are nominated by the President of the United States and must face a series of hearings in which both the nominee and other witnesses make statements and answer questions before the Senate Judiciary Committee, which can vote to send the nomination to the full United States Senate.[1] Confirmation by the Senate allows the President to formally appoint the candidate to the court.[1] The Constitution does not set any qualifications for service as a Justice, thus the President may nominate any individual to serve on the Court.

Senate cloture rules historically required a two-thirds affirmative vote to advance nominations to a vote; this was changed to a three-fifths supermajority in 1975. In November 2013, the then-Democratic Senate majority eliminated the filibuster for executive branch nominees and judicial nominees except for Supreme Court nominees by invoking the so-called nuclear option. In April 2017, the Republican Senate majority applied the nuclear option to Supreme Court nominations as well,[2] enabling the nominations of Trump nominees Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh to proceed to a vote.....

Hope this helps ;)

5 0
3 years ago
According to Zinn, how is history presenting an inaccurate representation of the cultural encounter between Columbus and the Ara
ExtremeBDS [4]
The women choose men to sleep with and if they tire of him while pregnant
5 0
3 years ago
The case of United States v. Stevens in 2010 is an example of the Supreme Court’s power of
dolphi86 [110]
Free speech is your answer

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Russians defeat both Hitler and Napoleon?
anygoal [31]
<span>How did the Russians defeat both Hitler and Napoleon?


</span>
<span>First off, they started pretty well. When the Germans first invaded, the people thought they were being liberated (tells you a lot about the government at the time) and were treated pretty well. But then they started killing people and things went downhill. Now, Hitler had this grand idea to take over Stalingrad (mostly for its namesake, Stalin). He thought it would be a massive blow to the Russian morale. But instead of basing his military strageties on logic, he did on feelings (he wanted to beat Stalin); which is never a good thing. Unforunately, he didn't anticipate Russian winter (which, luckily for the Russians, came early that year and ironically the same year for Napoleon). So the German army was stuck in Summer gear, rather then the proper Winter gear (which was promised but never came through). AND look at Russia as a whole: It's a huge country (I heard it takes around 8-10 days to just get through Russia straight across). Now, to the other guy above me. Russia isn't known for having the strongest armies ever. Actually, compared to the Germans they were undisclipined, untrained and from all types of backgrounds, and all ages, etc. Hardly sounds like an ideal army. But the Russian people were stubborn and burned everything, so in that way the German army failed. Plus, Russia had an endless supply of men. Hitler was shocked to notice, there was always a fresh supply of men waiting to fight.

So in conclusion, Russia's massive land(s) and brutal winters contributed to both the fails of Napoleon and Hitler's conquer of Russia. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Louisiana purchase (1803) was a foreign policy success for the United States primarily because it
    9·2 answers
  • How did william shakespeare influence the Renaissance
    7·1 answer
  • During the Mexican-American War, __________ helped fight for a free California.
    10·1 answer
  • Who led the army of northern Virginia after May 1862 to the end of the war?
    15·1 answer
  • Give a brief description of Gregor Mendal's experiments and the results
    11·1 answer
  • How would the world be different if the Columbian Exchange never happened?
    8·2 answers
  • 1) What reasons did the members of the Constitutional Convention have for creating the Electoral College? Use examples from your
    12·1 answer
  • What was life like for Polish citizens who were not Jewish during Nazi occupation?
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following did the Soviet Atomic Threat lead to?*
    9·1 answer
  • I need help with A and D <br> I will give brainliest
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!