Answer:
It is there history of there creativity of making the design of the Rock for Kings and other richer people so that their place can look better then any other
Explanation:
Indian rock-cut architecture has more examples than any other form of rock-cut architecture in the world.
[1] Rock-cut architecture defines the practice of creating a structure by carving it out of solid natural rock. The craftsman removes rock not part of the structure until the architectural elements of the excavated interior constitute the only rock left. Indian rock-cut architecture, for the most part, is religious in nature.
[2] In India, caves have long been regarded as places of sanctity. Enlarged or entirely man-made caves hold the same sanctity as natural caves. The sanctuary in all Indian religious structures, even free standing ones, retain the same cave-like feeling of sacredness, being small and dark without natural light.
Curiously, Buddhist monks created their cave hermitages near trade routes that crossed northern India during the time of Christ. As wealthy traders became aware of the Buddhist caves, they became benefactors of expansion of the caves, the building of monolithic rock-cut temples, and of free-standing temples. Emperors and rulers also supported the devotional work and participated in the spiritual devotional services. Very likely, traders would use the hermitages for worship on their routes. As Buddhism weakened in the face of a renewed Hinduism during the eighth century C.E., the rock structure maintenance, expansion, and upgrading fell to the Hindus and Jains. Hindu holy men continued building structures out of rock, dedicating temples to Hindu gods like Shiva, until mysteriously they abandoned the temples around the twelfth century C.E. They abandoned the structures so completely that even local peoples lost knowledge of the awesome structures in their midst. Only in the nineteenth century, when British adventurers and explorers found them, did India rediscover the awesome architecture that comprises world treasures.
Answer:
The previous government was democratic; Hitler was a dictator.
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
A civil society method of limiting government could be:
A: journalists investigating reports of wrongdoing by public officials.
B: special interest groups running advertisements informing the general public of the possible impact of a proposed new regulation;
C: members of the parent/teacher association protesting a cut in school budgets.
So the answer is D, all of the above are correct.
Answer:
Ways & Means the Voters & their Eected Representatives can Check the Powers of the Judicial Branch
- <em>Voters can check the power of the judicial Branch by electing representatives who adhere strictly to the provisions of the Constitution;</em>
- <em>Voters can sponsor private bills requesting the representatives to impeach a judge as in the case of the United States of America;</em>
- <em>In the case of my country, Nigeria, the voters can file petitions to National Judicial Council (NJC) urging them to investigate the ill-conducts of corrupt Judges and gross abuse of office;</em>
- <em>Congress has the authority under the constitution to limit the jurisdiction of any or all Federal Courts;</em>
- <em>Judicial activism can be checked by active and vibrant representations;</em>
- <em>Voters should not re-elect representatives who play into/profit from the gridlock/inaction system.</em>
In short, Germany was close to being defeated, and America wanted to be part of the post war carve up (when territory was divided). The US was supplying war materials to the Allies and could not do so while maintaining complete neutrality. There was also the sinking of the British ship Lusitania which angered the US. Also, the Zimmerman telegram.
