1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fiasKO [112]
4 years ago
14

What is 0.09 divided by 1.77

Mathematics
2 answers:
mylen [45]4 years ago
6 0
0.0508474576
0.0508474576
lianna [129]4 years ago
5 0
0.05294117647 is what I got 
You might be interested in
What is true about every rotation?
defon
I believe the answer is A.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Simplify the expression<br><br> 3+2x(8-3)<br><br> A.25<br> B.37<br> C.13<br> D.16
skelet666 [1.2K]
C. 13

3+2x(8-3) 13
8-3=5
3 0
4 years ago
A data mining routine has been applied to a transaction dataset and has classified 88 records as fraudulent (30 correctly so) an
chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

The classification matrix is attached below

Part a

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is 65.91%.

Part b

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is 96.64%

Step-by-step explanation:

The classification matrix is obtained as shown below:

The transaction dataset has 30 fraudulent correctly classified records out of 88 records, that is, 30 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is negative.

Also, there would be 88 - 30 = 58 non-fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 58 records are incorrectly predicted given that an instance is positive.

The transaction dataset has 920 non-fraudulent correctly classified records out of 952 records, that is, 920 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is positive.

Also, there would be 952 - 920 = 32 fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 32 records incorrectly predicted given that an instance is negative.

That is,

                                                                            Predicted value

                           Active value                 Fraudulent       Non-fraudulent

                              Fraudlent                         30                       58

                          non-fraudulent                   32                     920

The classification matrix is obtained by using the information related to the transaction data, which is classified into fraudulent records and non-fraudulent records.

The error rate is obtained as shown below:

The error rate is obtained by taking the ratio of \left( {b + c} \right)(b+c) and the total number of records.

The classification matrix is, shown above

The total number of records is, 30 + 58 + 32 + 920 = 1,040

The error rate is,

\begin{array}{c}\\{\rm{Error}}\,{\rm{rate}} = \frac{{b + c}}{{{\rm{Total}}}}\\\\ = \frac{{58 + 32}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = \frac{{90}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = 0.0865\\\end{array}  

The percentage is 0.0865 \times 100 = 8.65

(a)

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained by taking the rate ratio of b and \left( {a + b} \right)(a+b) .

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown above and in the attachment

The error rate for truly fraudulent is,

\begin{array}{c}\\FP = \frac{b}{{a + b}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{30 + 58}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{88}}\\\\ = 0.6591\\\end{array}  

The percentage is, 0.6591 \times 100 = 65.91

(b)

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained by taking the ratio of d and \left( {c + d} \right)(c+d) .

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown in the attachment

The error rate for truly non-fraudulent is,

\begin{array}{c}\\TP = \frac{d}{{c + d}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{32 + 920}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{952}}\\\\ = 0.9664\\\end{array}

The percentage is, 0.9664 \times 100 = 96.64

8 0
3 years ago
Please help me with this question. Hope to get answers asap!
avanturin [10]

Answer: Approximately 7.4162

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which expression is equivalent to 21 × 7?
Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

a)

Step-by-step explanation:

its the same thing if you multiply 3×4 and 4×3 for example

and you get the same result both times

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Your wife has asked you to pick up a bottle of her favorite shampoo. When you get to the store, you can't remember which brand s
    10·2 answers
  • On a coordinate plane the location of 3 points are (0,6) (5,-4) and (-1,-5) where would the fourth point need to be located in o
    11·1 answer
  • 6z^6-21z^4-12z^2<br>give in step by step explanation​
    9·2 answers
  • Describe the type of solution for the given system of linear equations.
    8·1 answer
  • How do you solve 8(2m+1) ?
    9·2 answers
  • If A and B are two points having coordinates (- 2, 2) and (2,-4) respectively, find the coordinates of P such that AP= AB.​
    10·1 answer
  • Why would a statistician consider an inference incomplete without an accompanying measure of its​ reliability?
    5·1 answer
  • Simplify 3(x+4)<br> A.3(x+4)<br> B.7x<br> C.12x<br> D.3X+12
    7·2 answers
  • My REAL FINAL LAST 100 points, pls do me well this time... show work pls :(
    12·1 answer
  • calculate the weekly repayment on a $30,000 loan that is charged at a simple interest rate of 10.14% for 3 years
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!