1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alecsey [184]
3 years ago
11

Explain the similarities and the differences between the Qur'an and the Bible’s teachings.

History
1 answer:
yawa3891 [41]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: First of all, they are both the sacred scriptures of major world religions. Second, they are viewed as a means of moral guidance to the communities to whom they were sent. Finally, they both contain apparent references to characters that appear to be the same historical figures.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Who were Mao Zedong, Zhou Enlai, and Deng Xiaoping?
Debora [2.8K]
Chairman Mao, was a Chinese communist revolutionary and founding father of the People's Republic of China, which he governed as the Chairman of the Communist Party of China from its establishment in 1949, until his death in 1976. His Marxist–Leninist theories, military strategies, and political policies are collectively known as Maoism or Marxism-Leninism-Maoism<span>.

</span> Zhou Enlai was the first Premier of the People's Republic of China, serving from October 1949 until his death in January 1976. Zhou served under Chairman Mao Zedong and was instrumental in the Communist Party's rise to power, and later in consolidating its control, forming foreign policy, and developing the Chinese economy<span>.
</span>
<span>Deng Xiaoping </span>was a Chinese revolutionary and statesman. He was the paramount leader of the People's Republic of China from 1978 until his retirement in 1989. After Chairman Mao Zedong's death, Deng led his country through far-reaching market-economy reforms. While Deng never held office as the head of state, head of government or General Secretary (that is, the leader of the Communist Party), he nonetheless was responsible for economic reforms and an opening of the global economy.

3 0
3 years ago
What did the south gain from the compromise of 1850?
n200080 [17]
The answer is: A more effective fugitive slave law
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
which feature of the us constitution did the federalists indicate to show that having to much power concentrated in one branch o
kirill [66]

Explanation:

How the U.S. Constitution Separates National Power

by Xiaohong Wei The Constitution of the United States of America, written well over 200 years ago, has been the foundation for building one of the great nations. It is the central instrument of American government and the supreme law of the land. For more than 200 years, it has guided the evolution of U.S. governmental institutions and has provided the basis for political stability, individual freedom, economic growth and social progress. However, the birth of the Constitution is not accidental, but has complicated economic and political backgrounds. The period after the Revolutionary War was characterized by economic depression and political crisis on the grounds that the Articles of Confederation just devised a loose association among the states, and set up a central government with very limited powers. The central government could not get the dominant position in the country’s political life while the individual states could do things in their own ways. In this chaotic situation, the central government was incapable of paying its debt, of regulating foreign and domestic commerce, of maintaining a steady value of the currency, and worst of all, incapable of keeping a strong military force to protect the country’s interests from foreign violations. As time went by, the old system became more and more adverse to the development of the young nation, and political reform seemed to be inevitable. The best solution was to draw up a new constitution in place of the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution was drawn up by 55 delegates of twelve states (all but Rhode Island) to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia during the summer of 1787 and ratified by the states in 1788. That distinguished gathering at Philadelphia’s Independence Hall brought together nearly all of the nation’s most prominent men, including George Washington, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and Benjamin Franklin. Many were experienced in colonial and state government and others had records of service in the army and in the courts. As Thomas Jefferson wrote John Adams when he heard who had been appointed: “It is really an assembly of demigods.” Despite the consensus among the framers on the objectives of the Constitution, the controversy over the means by which those objectives could be achieved was lively. However, most of the issues were settled by the framers’ efforts and compromises, thus the finished Constitution has been referred to as a “bundle of compromises”. It was only through give-and-take that a successful conclusion was achieved. Such efforts and compromises in the Constitutional Convention of 1787 produced the most enduring written Constitution ever created by humankinds. The men who were at Philadelphia that hot summer hammered out a document defining distinct powers for the Congress of the United States, the president, and the federal courts. This division of authority is known as a system of checks and balances, and it ensures that none of the branches of government can dominate the others. The Constitution also establishes and limits the authority of the Federal Government over the states and emphasizes that power of the states will serve as a check on the power of the national government.

<h3>I hope it will help you</h3>

<h3><em>please</em><em> make</em><em> me</em><em> brainlest</em></h3>

<h2>THANK U</h2>

5 0
3 years ago
Explain what happened in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia court case and Worchester v. Georgia court case.
oksian1 [2.3K]
The court ruled that the Cherokee could stay in there land w the Worchester v Georgia case but then Andrew Jackson overruled it and moved them anyway west to Oklahoma which led to the trail of tears
8 0
4 years ago
In what ways did public education improve during the progressive era?
erastovalidia [21]
Progressives believed that in order for people to become truly free and understand concepts like equality and democracy that they need to be educated and go to schools. This is why they tried to open as many as possible and help even the traditionally disenfranchises groups join the education system, even if in segregated schools. They also knew that the rapidly developing industry and economy needed a qualified workforce so they knew that the schools were the answer to that.
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What action caused France and Great Britain to declare war on Germany
    8·2 answers
  • How did world war 1 start
    11·1 answer
  • Who wanted to unite all of South America into a single nation
    10·1 answer
  • Russia’s rise as a nation is a story of influences from north, east, south, and west, and of powerful and ambitious rulers. Desc
    13·1 answer
  • What did "conformity" mean to hippies in the 1960s
    7·1 answer
  • Under the rule of man
    5·1 answer
  • What role does the president fill when working with congress to pass laws
    10·2 answers
  • Please help asap i really need help
    15·2 answers
  • How did the system of feudalism operate​
    13·2 answers
  • (01.05 MC)
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!