Where there any choices? This is true for a lot of countries: Basically all European countries with the exception of those that never fell to the Nazis :UK, Switzerland, Sweden, Spain, Portugal.
<span>The correct answer is D.The same evidence shows that both plebeian and a patrician committed assault. The plebeian is found guilty, while the patrician is found innocent.
Before they were introduced, there was no equality in front of the law when it came to different classes in the society. The situation in D describes how it would be before the law, while the twelve tables abolished this. Patricians and plebeians would now answer the same if proven guilty.</span>
Following the Supreme Court's decision on the AAA and NPR as unconstitutional, FDR attempted to add 2 more seats to the Supreme Court. Being there is no set number in the Constitution, FDR believed he had the right to add 2 more justices. Consequently, the additional seats would have gone to Democrats in favor of the New Deal legislation therefore overturning the blocks put into place. It was overwhelming viewed as an authoritarian move and criticize from all branches and both political parties. Being FDR would have to work within the system, he rewrote his New Deal policies to fit the standard of the Constitution and worked around the system to get his policies in place.
After doing some research, I believe the choices for this question are the following:
<span>Both empires shared like laws and traditions.
Both empires originated in Western Europe.
Both empires required all citizens to be fluent in Latin.
Both empires considered the emperor the ultimate religious authority.
Among these statements, the one that describes a similarity between the Byzantine and Roman Empire is: </span>Both empires shared like laws and traditions.
