1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
elena-s [515]
3 years ago
13

this is my religion. This I what I live for.

History
1 answer:
Neporo4naja [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

ok...

Explanation:

You might be interested in
During the drafting of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, early Americans debated how much power states and the federal go
Alona [7]

I think that eventhough, Federal Government has too much power and is it wanted it could change the life of their citizens from one day to another, it also gives to the states to act with freedom and decide how to live in society in their terrotories with their own laws. This a positive feature of the Federal Government, allowing the states to act with certain freedom and ruling their territories by them selves.

In my opinion there are not good or bad powers, but there good or bad people so it does not depend on the powers, it dependes on the people that has them and how they use it. For example the Federal Government gives the states to choose if the marijuana is legal or not in their territories and nowadays sevral states legalized it and others do not. In this case for example it dependes on the control that the State Government does over this matter and that pople respect the rules of how to use it and consume it. This matter is really important and affects the economy of the United States, but if the Federal and the State Government cooperate to control and give this industry a conscious and responsible use, this is a good choice that both authorities are making.

3 0
3 years ago
What might have happened if the south had refused to adhere to reconstruction guidelines?
vesna_86 [32]

Answer:

When the Civil War ended, leaders turned to the question of how to reconstruct the nation. One important issue was the right to vote, and the rights of black American men and former Confederate men to vote were hotly debated.

In the latter half of the 1860s, Congress passed a series of acts designed to address the question of rights, as well as how the Southern states would be governed. These acts included the act creating the Freedmen's Bureau, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and several Reconstruction Acts. The Reconstruction Acts established military rule over Southern states until new governments could be formed. They also limited some former Confederate officials' and military officers' rights to vote and to run for public office. (However, the latter provisions were only temporary and soon rescinded for almost all of those affected by them.) Meanwhile, the Reconstruction acts gave former male slaves the right to vote and hold public office.

Congress also passed two amendments to the Constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment made African-Americans citizens and protected citizens from discriminatory state laws. Former Confederate states did not get congressional representation until they adopted this amendment. The Fifteenth Amendment guaranteed African American men the right to vote.

Most of the documents in this section are related to the right to vote and how voting actually occurred in Southern states. Other rights are also discussed in some of the documents. As you read the documents, weigh the various arguments that are made. Also, look for similarities with issues or concerns that have been raised in more recent U.S. history.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the president not allowed to do as commander-in-Chief
BARSIC [14]

Answer:

Under the Constitution, the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy is the supreme military commander charged with the responsibility of protecting and defending the United States. ... Thus the Con- stitution speaks of the power of the Congress “to raise and support Armies,” art.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Was the united states justified in going to war with mexico mini-q answers
Paha777 [63]
The U.S. in 1846 was not justified in going to war with Mexico, they didn't have justification to respond with violence.
5 0
3 years ago
I dont know what to add onto this!!! Can someone help me???
kenny6666 [7]

Answer:

You can put lots

Explanation:

For example

Somebody: Half of Americans

Wanted: A non Republican President

But: The other Half wanted a Republican President

So: They committed voter fraud

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following constitutional principles is more directly supported by the 17th amendment
    10·1 answer
  • Select which documents limited the power of the monarchy.
    14·2 answers
  • Budha summary in world relifion relifion
    6·1 answer
  • Effect: Lincoln and his mother move to sycamore
    12·1 answer
  • Why was it unlikely an amendment to the Constitution to end slavery would pass?
    9·2 answers
  • During the Tang Dynasty, iron and coal industries were very successful.
    12·1 answer
  • PLS HURRY, TAKING A QUIZ!! I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!
    14·2 answers
  • Who started the assembly line method of production?
    8·2 answers
  • ASAP I NEED HELPPPPPP
    10·2 answers
  • What was the historical event which ultimately led to the revolution which deposed the tsar?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!