Step-by-step explanation:
Sry if it is blurr, is this what you wanted?
Answer:
(g◦f)(x) = 2x +1
Step-by-step explanation:
(g◦f)(x) = g(f(x)) = g(2x -1) = (2x -1) +2
(g◦f)(x) = 2x +1
__
Substitute f(x) for the argument in the function g(x) and simplify.
<h3><em>(HCF)=(36,60,84)</em></h3><h3><em>Factors of 36
</em></h3><h3><em>
</em></h3><h3><em>List of positive integer factors of 36 that divides 36 without a remainder.
</em></h3><h3><em>
</em></h3><h3><em>1,2,3,4,6,9,12,18,36</em></h3><h3>Factors of 60
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>List of positive integer factors of 60 that divides 60 without a remainder.
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>1,2,3,4,5,6,10,12,15,20,30,60</h3><h3>Factors of 84
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>List of positive integer factors of 84 that divides 84 without a remainder.
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>1,2,3,4,6,7,12,14,21,28,42,84</h3><h3 /><h3>We found the factors 36,60,84 . The biggest common factor number is the HCF number.
</h3><h3>So the highest common factor 36,60,84 is 12.</h3><h3><em>HOPE IT HELPS....</em></h3>
The simplest interpretation would go a little something like this:
We know that we want the total donation amount to be more than $7,900, so we can set up this inequality to begin with

Where
D is the total donations raised (in dollars). How do we find D? Well, we just add up the total number of table reservations sold and the total number of single tickets sold. If we let
r stand for the number of reservation tickets and
s stand for the number of single tickets, then we have

So, the inequality representing this situation would be

And that would probably be fine for this problem.
<span><em>Footnote:</em>
</span>Of course, if this were a real-life scenario, we'd need to take some additional details into account: How many tables do we have? How many people can be seated at each table?