It spread several disease among the people, which where spread to Native Americans killing their population
Answer:
<em>In a two-party system, a voter who supports the view of one party on one topic, but supports the view of the other party on another topic, is forced to compromise one of their views. A multi-party system, on the other hand, allows each citizen to vote for the party that best fits their complex beliefs.</em>
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the first choice or letter A. The swamp forests formed into tropical rain forests.
The Carboniferous Period<span> is famous for its vast swamp forests, such as the one depicted here. Such swamps produced the coal from which the term </span>Carboniferous<span>, or "carbon-bearing," is derived. The </span>Carboniferous Period<span> lasted from about 359.2 to 299 million years ago* during the late Paleozoic </span>Era<span>.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly.
I would say A) evolving attitudes of the public, D) current events, and E) ideologies of individual justices.
I don't think B is correct because the judicial branch is supposed to act as a check against the executive branch and therefore cannot be instructed to rule a certain way by any president, and I don't think C is correct because changes to the bill of rights would have less impact on interpretation of the constitution and more of an impact on the constitution/law itself
Governments typically had been either unitary or confederated. Or another way to say that is that they either focused on centralized power (in someone like a king) or particularized power -- the power in the parts of a kingdom rather than at the center.
So, for instance, in France (prior to its Revolution), all the power in the kingdom centered in the hands of the king. For 175 years, they didn't even have a meeting of the Estates General which was their version of a representative body. And the power of nobles on their lands was reduced while the king's power grew.
Meanwhile, in the German territories, there was a loose confederation called the Holy Roman Empire. One of the kings or princes held the title of "emperor," but he really had no imperial power. The confederated German states retained control over their own kingdoms or territories.
The American experiment mixed something of the best of both approaches. There would be strong central power in the federal government, but putting checks and balances on that power by retaining certain aspects of control in the hands of the states within the union.
