1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
-BARSIC- [3]
3 years ago
11

What was significant about the battle of New York? It proved the Americans were no match for the British army. It was a major lo

ss that could not be overcome. It proved the quality of chosen continental commander. It provided needed supplies for the British army.
History
2 answers:
grandymaker [24]3 years ago
8 0

It proved the quality of chosen continental commander, i believe correct me if im wrong.

alukav5142 [94]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:  

It was a major loss that could not be overcome

THIS ONE IS RIGHT MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST

You might be interested in
PLEASE HURRY AND HELP
lesantik [10]

The sixteenth, seventeenth and eighteenth centuries changed the world in dramatic ways. But probably, the biggest change the world saw or has ever seen, was the finding and conquest of the Americas. Many are the theories as to what led both the Spanish and Portuguese empires to seek these voyages, but the truth of the matter is that the main reasons that pushed Spain to support Cristopher Columbus in his trip in 1492 were, first, the desire to discover and open new trade routes to the Indies. And the second reason was evangelization, which the two Spanish moarchs believed would be empowered by colonization.

When the Spanish first arrived in the Americas, their first encounter was not with any big Native tribes or settled civilizations. It was not until later on, in 1519, that the Spanish encountered true Native American civilization. And the first to find this was Hernán Cortés, who between 1519 and 1521, led a war against the Aztec Empire, one of the biggest and most important of the entire continent. The Aztecs were settled in the Gulf of Mexico, in what is today Mexico itself. The Aztecs, led by Moctezuma II were really advanced people, with a federal-like way of government, cities, technology and an organized society. But like all well-organized and advanced societies, problems arose. The first was that through contact with the Spanish, many diseases unknown until then diminished the number of Natives and also because of weaponry, which allowed the Spanish to finally overcome the Aztec forces.

The second empire was the Inca Empire, in what is today Peru, specifically in Cusco. Unlike its sister empire in Mexico, the Incas did not have wheeled vehicles and they did not use farm animals. They did not have a currency and they survived on exchange of goods, instead of a market. What made them really advanced was their ability in masonry and the use of stone. Their architecture was really advanced and like the Aztecs, their cities were impressive. They also had a centralized system of government led by a king, who at the time of the arrival of the Conquistadors was Atahualpa and the king was considered the owner of everything within the empire. They also had a very advanced system of roads that connected the central city of Machu Picchu with the rest of the Empire. It was Francisco Pizarro who in 1526 moved from Panama to the Andean region and found himself at Machu Picchu. After several trips, finally, between 1532 and 1533, Francisco Pizarro and the Spanish were able to take control of the vast Inca Empire.

In the end, most of the Americas, save what is nowadays Brazil, that ended in the hands of Portugal, became part of the enormous Spanish Empire. The result was a group of colonies from which the Spanish derived the precious metal of gold and which made them really rich. The Natives, at first were enslaved by the Spanish until through intervention of the Church, black people were brought in to prevent the death of the Natives. Disease also decimated the Native population in the Americas. There was a lot of racial mixing betwen the Spanish and Natives, which gave origin to many new skin colors, typical of Spanish America.  

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Días' voyage around the tip of Africa affect Columbus' plans to sail west?
kondaur [170]
When Dias went to Africa Columbus refused to go there and then re-routed<span> Hope that helped ;)</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Why did las casas feel it was okay to become a plantation owner, own slaves and conquer the native people?
notsponge [240]
West Indies and focus particularly on the atrocities committed by the colonizers against the indigenous peoples. So he just felt the need to do it.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Briefly outline the major features shared by most pre-modern African societies. Could you argue that pre-modern African cultures
zalisa [80]

Answer:

In pre-modern Sub-Saharan Africa, the basic unit of society was the clan or lineage-group. African societies were also largely structured into villages until the first chiefdoms and kingdoms began to appear.

Explanation:

Throughout Sub-Saharan Africa, the basic unit of society was the clan group, which would typically live together as a cluster of households and thus small hamlets or villages would form on the bases of lineages and allied lineages. Large towns would be an amalgamation of these clans, and they would often be distributed as smaller villages of clans grouped together. Each village would be principled around the power of what anthropologists call a “big man.” They were the person whom the clan believed was the most directly descended from their founding ancestors. He would be joined by his extended family as well as more distant relatives, and often unrelated families who had been separated from their own clans and who looked to the big man for guidance and protection. In North Africa and the Saharan Desert, the organization of society was different and largely resembled cultures in the Middle East that were nomadic in large part.

7 0
2 years ago
Who were the big three, who made most of the decisions about how World War II would end and what would happen afterward?
xenn [34]

Answer:   Big Three: Soviet Union leader Josef Stalin; U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt; and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill.

Explanation:  The first meeting of the Big Three was in Tehran, Iran, on November 28, 1943, where some of the topics of the meeting were the preparation of invasions to Western Europe in the spring of 1944, invasion to South France, etc. Another meeting of the great three was in February 1945, at a conference in Yalta, where they discussed how to manage postwar in Europe.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Match the vocabulary word with its meaning.
    6·1 answer
  • ??????????????????????????
    11·1 answer
  • What country had been carved into " spheres of influence" in the U.S history?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the concept of Northwest Identity?
    11·2 answers
  • Anyone have the answer to this question??
    11·1 answer
  • Why were Progressive politics, the idea that the
    10·1 answer
  • When did women finally win the right to vote?
    10·1 answer
  • In Re Gault was a landmark decision issued by the U.S. Supreme Court that established that a juvenile must be given similar due
    8·1 answer
  • What is one way in which French culture supported the Second Estate?
    5·1 answer
  • How did beliefs about the nature of government and human freedom lead to the colonies’ break with Britain?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!