1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andrei [34K]
3 years ago
5

A corporate executive may be found criminally liable even if he did not know about the company's criminal violation.

Social Studies
1 answer:
vodomira [7]3 years ago
5 0
The answer would be TRUE because even if the corporate executive wasn't part of the crime, he is still responsible for the company and represents them as well so you honestly say its guilty by association since they worked closely and he didn't commit any crimes and he can be viewed as a suspect since the court has to see proof he wasn't part of them.
You might be interested in
Hey someone help me with this.<br><br><br> How did Ancient Indians make advances to their culture
spayn [35]

Answer:

They both make amazing food

Explanation:

i was in yoir class

4 0
3 years ago
Why did the founding fathers write the constitution?​
OleMash [197]

Answer:

In 1787, Congress authorized delegates to gather in Philadelphia and recommend changes to the existing charter of government for the 13 states, the Articles of Confederation, which many Americans believed had created a weak, ineffective central government.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please answer this question about the tea act:
Arturiano [62]

Answer:

The Tea Act of 1773 was one of several measures imposed on the American colonists by the heavily indebted British government in the decade leading up to the American Revolutionary War (1775-83). The act’s main purpose was not to raise revenue from the colonies but to bail out the floundering East India Company, a key actor in the British economy. The British government granted the company a monopoly on the importation and sale of tea in the colonies. The colonists had never accepted the constitutionality of the duty on tea, and the Tea Act rekindled their opposition to it. Their resistance culminated in the Boston Tea Party on December 16, 1773, in which colonists boarded East India Company ships and dumped their loads of tea overboard. Parliament responded with a series of harsh measures intended to stifle colonial resistance to British rule; two years later the war began.

 <u>Please Give Me BRAINLIEST!!</u>

<u></u>

5 0
3 years ago
Which feature must a nation have to be considered
Alexxandr [17]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Short-duration strikes and other small-scale offensive actions conducted as a special operation in hostile, denied, or political
lesya [120]

Answer: A (Direct action)

Explanation:

The above statement is the definition of direct action strike according to US department of defense.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Some people always think that everyone is looking at them and talking about them, wishing to be like them. This self-focused vie
    13·1 answer
  • Cynthia thinks that all her problems stem from the fact that she can't find a husband. She's posted her profile online, she's as
    8·1 answer
  • The Sunday before Easter is called ____ Sunday
    6·1 answer
  • Why was there a need for order after the death of Charlemagne?
    14·1 answer
  • What are the challenges of increased immigration?
    5·1 answer
  • Mendax Pharmaceuticals is trying out its new antidepressant. One group of participants took the new drug, another group received
    15·1 answer
  • The principal colonial opposition to the stamp act was that it..?
    10·2 answers
  • What is MOST LIKELY the reason the author included the description of Stan Tucker meeting Zac Brown?
    6·1 answer
  • What do you mean by military revolt?​
    5·1 answer
  • Giving brainliest for correct answer page 175​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!