Hey there!
Native American Contribution: Helping the "patriots" learning basic survival skills, being diversity with cultural bounds, fishing, and hunting.
African American Contribution: Building economic stability. As well as Native Americans giving a cultural diffusion of diversity "indirectly", they surely were treated differently due to slavery, and taught whites that not everybody comes from the same backgrounds/places.
Women Contribution: Practically the highlight of America on what it is today, with being able to vote, and being able to be themselves. We give out different rights for women here then what others do in other countries around the world. With having that in mind, women across the world strive to enter the United States of America just for the purpose of having these specific rights of which they strive for in their very own countries.
Children Contribution: Children ARE our future. Passing down the basis of knowledge from generations on generations. They are the sprouting roots of everyone and everything. Very important.
Reflection Questions:
Personally, I believe Women have contributed the most in American society and culture. From raising the children that ARE our future, and much more. From striving for their own rights, and influencing others to come and have the same growth of rights and power. Women are the biggest impact.
The role of children in society has changed quite a bit compared to colonial times. Colonial times we had kids in factories for labor, and hardworking specialists for the small cent. Nowadays, we have many more opportunities for healthcare, schooling, and more. Definitely in my sense, being different.
Hope this helped!
Being a good strategist is not necessarily about winning battles, but making the right/favourable preparations and choosing the right conditions for a battle. There are three realms where warfare are concerned: strategy, tactics, and logistics. All are important, but the latter is almost always neglected by amateurs such as Adolf Hitler.
Caius Julius Caesar is particularly well-known for his campaigns in Galia Transalpina (France). He was fortunate enough to keep the gaulic tribes at odds with each other during most of his stay, but responded competently when they united under Vercingetorix. Caesar also fought the loyalists for control of the Roman Empire, and defeated Pompeius Magnus at Pharsalus.
Caesar had the benefit of mostly fighting disorganised and easily startled Gauls during most of his career, not to mention incompetent enemy commanders. Yet his genius was probably more in being able to combine good generalship with very shrewd politicking. He was extremely indebted during most of his career and hounded by Senators that wanted his head because they saw him as a demagogue. Caesar's only choices were to surrender and be forced into some ignominious and inglorious life or to press onward to become the new king of Rome.
He crossed the the River Rubicon with only 5,000 men and forced the Senate to flee the eternal city. He left Mark Antony in his stead to manage affairs in Rome while he campaigned (he had a sound judgment of people) in Greece. It should be noted that Caesar was uncommonly lucky (until the end) and ever so daring. Even though he did not always start the battle with the enemy, he usually forced his enemies to fight him on his own terms. He was very active as a commander and very good at promoting loyalty among the ranks (both thanks to praise and loot). He always took contingency precautions such as when he called for the aid of Mithradates of Pergamum when Caesar was besieged by the Egyptians in Alexandria.
However, take note that there were other very good Roman generals such as Pompeius Magnus, Mark Antony, Caius Marius, Lucius Sulla and Scipio Africanus. All of these are known to history and some even fought more distinguished battles than Caesar, but unfortunately they are neither as significant nor as popular as Caesar.
**sorry it was so long, sum it up if ya need to/**
Answer:
i can help you with your assignment check me on ig essaywriter04 or mail essay04writer at gml dot com
Causes The roots of the Revolutionary War ran deep in the structure of the British empire, an entity transformed, like the British state itself, by the Anglo‐French wars of the eighteenth century. After the fourth of these conflicts, the Seven Years' (or French and Indian) War, the British government tried to reform the now greatly expanded empire.
One impact the importation of cotton had on great britain was that it fueled lots of the Industrial Revolution, which was heavily dependent on cotton to duel the booming textile industry. <span />
