Lita is suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and the incidents that she is facing; are the symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder.
<h3>What do you mean by post-traumatic stress disorder?</h3>
A sickness characterized by way of means of failure to recover after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event is referred to as post-traumatic stress disorder.
The situation might also additionally take ultimate months or years, with triggers that may deliver lower back reminiscences of the trauma followed via way of means of severe emotional and bodily reactions.
Hence, Lita is getting symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder.
Learn more about stress disorders here:
brainly.com/question/26108464
#SPJ1
Good and bad pointsGood points of duty-based ethics<span><span>emphasises the value of every human being<span>Duty-based ethical systems tend to focus on giving equal respect to all human beings.This provides a basis for human rights - it forces due regard to be given to the interests of a single person even when those are at odds with the interests of a larger group.</span></span><span>says some acts are always wrong<span>Kantian duty-based ethics says that some things should never be done, no matter what good consequences they produce. This seems to reflect the way some human beings think.Rossian duty-based ethics modified this to allow various duties to be balanced, which, it could be argued, is an even better fit to the way we think.</span></span><span>provides 'certainty'<span>Consequentialist ethical theories bring a degree of uncertainty to ethical decision-making, in that no-one can be certain about what consequences will result from a particular action, because the future is unpredictable.Duty-based ethics don't suffer from this problem because they are concerned with the action itself - if an action is a right action, then a person should do it, if it's a wrong action they shouldn't do it - and providing there is a clear set of moral rules to follow then a person faced with a moral choice should be able to take decisions with reasonable certainty.Of course things aren't that clear cut. Sometimes consequentialist theories can provide a fair degree of certainty, if the consequences are easily predictable.Furthermore, rule-based consequentialism provides people with a set of rules that enable them to take moral decisions based on the sort of act they are contemplating.</span></span><span>deals with intentions and motives<span>Consequentialist theories don't pay direct attention to whether an act is carried out with good or bad intentions; most people think these are highly relevant to moral judgements.Duty-based ethics can include intention in at least 2 ways...If a person didn't intend to do a particular wrong act - it was an accident perhaps - then from a deontological point of view we might think that they hadn't done anything deserving of criticism. This seems to fit with ordinary thinking about ethical issues.Ethical rules can be framed narrowly so as to include intention.</span></span></span>Bad points of duty-based ethics<span><span>absolutistDuty-based ethics sets absolute rules. The only way of dealing with cases that don't seem to fit is to build a list of exceptions to the rule.</span><span>allows acts that make the world a less good place<span>Because duty-based ethics is not interested in the results it can lead to courses of action that produce a reduction in the overall happiness of the world.Most people would find this didn't fit with their overall idea of ethics:</span></span></span>
...it is hard to believe that it could ever
This is a very controversial topic and many researchers, pseudo scientists and conspiracy theorists believe that Pyramids could not have been build by the human hand. One reason would be the location. Place where they were built is far away from the nearest source of stone they used to build them. According to the researchers it is impossible to transport that amount of stones with the equipment they had at the time. The second reason would be the shape of the pyramid. According to the laws of physics, the stones could not be lifted at that height and placed at that angle .
Naughty Elephants Spray Water
or Never Ever Smoke Weed
Deductive reasoning is also referred to as top-down reasoning, because it starts at the "top" with the more general understandings, working "down" to specific conclusions.
