1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anestetic [448]
3 years ago
15

Which of the following

History
1 answer:
Debora [2.8K]3 years ago
6 0
B I think I’m not 100% sure
You might be interested in
Please help me answering this?
mylen [45]
what are you trying to answer
6 0
3 years ago
03:Posttest 03:Module 3: Non-westem Early History
Norma-Jean [14]

He lost a decisive battle to Ghana.

ptive) -

7 0
3 years ago
What did north get in slavery in the Constitutional compromise?​Someone that is good at U. S. history,please help me.Please some
professor190 [17]

Answer:

The "Three-fifths compromise"

Explanation:

An agreement between delegates from the Northern and the Southern states at the United States Constitutional Convention (1787) that three-fifths of the slave population would be counted for determining direct taxation and representation in the House of Representatives.

7 0
3 years ago
How was the House of Burgesses different than the British Parliament?
lukranit [14]
The correct answer is A
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are advantages and disadvantages of permanent settlements
ivanzaharov [21]

Answer: Advantages:

1. The peasants condition improved and there was an

improvement in agriculture.

2. It resulted in a political advantage to the English as

the landlords who became the owners of the land became true supporters of the

English government.

3. Permanent Settlement led to the modernisation of India in

the sphere of revenue system.

4. The English government did not have to fix the revenue

every year. The income of the government was fixed once for all.

5. A large number of employees were no longer needed for the

revenue administration of the company and could devote their services to other

departments of the company.

But some scholars say that the permanent settlement had many

disadvantages:  

1. It had an adverse affect on the income of the company as

the revenue was fixed on the low side due to lack of proper measurement.

2. The system was beneficial only for the landlords. The

condition of farmers did not improve and they continued to be the victims of harassments

by the landlord.

3. The landlords who were not able to pay the required

revenue, their land was sold off.

4. The landlords led a luxurious life and did not do anything

to improve agricultural produce.

5. The system created a special class of zamindars who were

loyal to the English this hurt the national feeling of the people.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • If a law is unconstitutional, the Supreme Court<br> can
    9·2 answers
  • Please help me answer the question in the picture I can't figure it out
    5·1 answer
  • Read the passage:
    9·2 answers
  • The purpose of the Jay Treaty was to avoid __________.
    12·1 answer
  • What happened to African American in the south after reconstruction?
    5·1 answer
  • ANSWER THIS ASAP I ONLY HAVE 15 MINUTES!!! Click to review the online content. Then answer the question(s) below, using complete
    14·1 answer
  • Historians often call Bhakti Thapa a Budho Baagh (an old tiger) due to his energy and will power. Justify the claim highlighting
    12·1 answer
  • I need help with this please​
    11·1 answer
  • How are communism and fascism alike
    6·1 answer
  • Identify the Roman peace? Or the Pax Romana?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!