PLZ HELP!

Mathematics

2 answers:

ziro4ka [17]3 years ago

7 0

The correct answer would be D.

WITCHER [35]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation for the sequence turns out to be 2( $3^{n-1}$ ) where n is the nth.

Plugging in 19 you get 2( $3^{18}$ ), or 774,840,978

You might be interested in

Jeff uses 3 fifth-size strips to mode 3/5. He wants to use tenth-size strips to model an equivalent fraction. How many tenth-siz

galben [10]

Wouldn't it just be 6 tenth sized for 6/10

4 0

3 years ago

Suppose each of the following data sets is a simple random sample from some population. For each dataset, make a normal QQ plot.

adell [148]

Answer:

a) For this case the histogram is not too skewed and we can say that is approximately symmetrical so then we can conclude that this dataset is similar to a normal distribution

b) For this case the data is skewed to the left and we can't assume that we have the normality assumption.

c) This last case the histogram is not symmetrical and the data seems to be skewed.

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we have the following data:

(a)data = c(7,13.2,8.1,8.2,6,9.5,9.4,8.7,9.8,10.9,8.4,7.4,8.4,10,9.7,8.6,12.4,10.7,11,9.4)

We can use the following R code to get the histogram

> x1<-c(7,13.2,8.1,8.2,6,9.5,9.4,8.7,9.8,10.9,8.4,7.4,8.4,10,9.7,8.6,12.4,10.7,11,9.4)

> hist(x1,main="Histogram a)")

The result is on the first figure attached.

For this case the histogram is not too skewed and we can say that is approximately symmetrical so then we can conclude that this dataset is similar to a normal distribution

(b)data = c(2.5,1.8,2.6,-1.9,1.6,2.6,1.4,0.9,1.2,2.3,-1.5,1.5,2.5,2.9,-0.1)

> x2<- c(2.5,1.8,2.6,-1.9,1.6,2.6,1.4,0.9,1.2,2.3,-1.5,1.5,2.5,2.9,-0.1)

> hist(x2,main="Histogram b)")

The result is on the first figure attached.

For this case the data is skewed to the left and we can't assume that we have the normality assumption.

(c)data = c(3.3,1.7,3.3,3.3,2.4,0.5,1.1,1.7,12,14.4,12.8,11.2,10.9,11.7,11.7,11.6)

> x3<-c(3.3,1.7,3.3,3.3,2.4,0.5,1.1,1.7,12,14.4,12.8,11.2,10.9,11.7,11.7,11.6)

> hist(x3,main="Histogram c)")

The result is on the first figure attached.

This last case the histogram is not symmetrical and the data seems to be skewed.