1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ulleksa [173]
3 years ago
6

According to Gribkov, why was Zorin unable to answer Adalai Stevenson’s question about the missiles in Cuba

History
2 answers:
luda_lava [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

I want to say to you, Mr. Zorin, that I do not have your talent for obfuscation, for distortion, for confusing language, and for doubletalk. And I must confess to you that I am glad that I do not!

But if I understood what you said, you said that my position had changed, that today I was defensive because we did not have the evidence to prove our assertions, that your Government had installed long-range missiles in Cuba.

Well, let me say something to you, Mr. Ambassador—we do have the evidence. We have it, and it is clear and it is incontrovertible. And let me say something else—those weapons must be taken out of Cuba.

Next, let me say to you that, if I understood you, with a trespass on credibility that excels your best, you said that our position had changed since I spoke here the other day because of the pressures of world opinion and the majority of the United Nations. Well, let me say to you, sir, you are wrong again. We have had no pressure from anyone whatsoever. We came in here today to indicate our willingness to discuss Mr. U Thant’s proposals, and that is the only change that has taken place.

But let me also say to you, sir, that there has been a change. You—the Soviet Union has sent these weapons to Cuba. You—the Soviet Union has upset the balance of power in the world. You—the Soviet Union has created this new danger, not the United States.

And you ask with a fine show of indignation why the President did not tell Mr. Gromyko on last Thursday about our evidence, at the very time that Mr. Gromyko was blandly denying to the President that the U.S.S.R. was placing such weapons on sites in the new world.

Well, I will tell you why—because we were assembling the evidence, and perhaps it would be instructive to the world to see how a Soviet official—how far he would go in perfidy. Perhaps we wanted to know if this country faced another example of nuclear deceit like that one a year ago, when in stealth, the Soviet Union broke the nuclear test moratorium.

And while we are asking questions, let me ask you why your Government—your Foreign Minister—deliberately, cynically deceived us about the nuclear build-up in Cuba.

And, finally, the other day, Mr. Zorin, I remind you that you did not deny the existence of these weapons. Instead, we heard that they had suddenly become defensive weapons. But today again if I heard you correctly, you now say that they do not exist, or that we haven’t proved they exist, with another fine flood of rhetorical scorn.

All right, sir, let me ask you one simple question: Do you, Ambassador Zorin, deny that the U.S.S.R. has placed and is placing medium- and intermediate-range missiles and sites in Cuba? Yes or no—don’t wait for the translation—yes or no?

(The Soviet representative refused to answer.)

You can answer yes or no. You have denied they exist. I want to know if I understood you correctly. I am prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over, if that’s your decision. And I am also prepared to present the evidence in this room.

(The President called on the representative of Chile to speak, but Ambassador Stevenson continued as follows.)

I have not finished my statement. I asked you a question. I have had no reply to the question, and I will now proceed, if I may, to finish my statement.

I doubt if anyone in this room, except possibly the representative of the Soviet Union, has any doubt about the facts. But in view of his statements and the statements of the Soviet Government up until last Thursday, when Mr. Gromyko denied the existence or any intention of installing such weapons in Cuba, I am going to make a portion of the evidence available right now. If you will indulge me for a moment, we will set up an easel here in the back of the room where I hope it will be visible to everyone.

ehidna [41]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

End the quarentine in cuba

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Write a public service announcement that explains the benefits of identifying opportunity costs when making decisions.
SashulF [63]

Answer:

Opportunity cost is the cost of the next-best option. It is something important to know.

Explanation:

In microeconomic theory, opportunity cost is the loss or the benefit that could have been enjoyed if the best alternative choice was chosen. As a representation of the relationship between scarcity and choice, the objective of opportunity cost is to ensure the efficient use of scarce resources.

Please mark brainliest.

7 0
2 years ago
Matching
Elden [556K]

note~ one of them is wrong im sorry

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Individual Rights

2. Separation of Powers

3. Federalism

4. amendment

5. The Legislative Branch

6. The Executive Branch

7. The Judicial Branch

8. House of Representatives

9. Senate

Explanation:

__6__ The branch of government that carries out laws.

__5__ The branch of government that makes laws; Congress

__4__ A way of changing the Constitution in order to adapt. It made the Constitution flexible and not rigid.

__7__ The branch of government that interprets laws

__2__ Power is balanced between the states and the national government.

__8__ The 'lower house' of Congress. Representation is based on state population.

__1__ personal liberties or privileges

__2__ dividing powers of government among the Executive, Legislative and Judicial Branches - They have their own responsibilities

__9__ Equal number of representation for each state in Congress.

7 0
3 years ago
Georgia was intented to be a second chance for which group of people A religious dissenters b former slaves c Debtors of the Eng
Shtirlitz [24]

Answer:

Debtors of the English Government

Explanation: The Georgia Trustees originally envisioned the new Georgia colony as a second chance for debtors in British jails.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is one possible outcome if local governments had greater power to challenge federal laws?
Zepler [3.9K]

Answer:

Governments will have more power than needed

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Several political causes contributed to the American Revolution. Parliament passed acts that disturbed the colonists. These acts
ioda
The Quartering Act required colonists to house British soldiers, and the Writs of Assistance allowed British officials to search homes, ships, and stores for smuggled goods without notice. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How Massents views about protection of the missions different from those of De Leon
    6·2 answers
  • Which statement about Ancestral Pueblo petroglyphs is true? They are made by painting or printing on rock. They show images of A
    15·1 answer
  • The immediate cause to the great depression was the
    11·1 answer
  • According to Steffens, what was the purpose of muckraking journalism?
    9·2 answers
  • When the president calls cabinet meeting today, the purpose of the meeting is to?
    13·1 answer
  • What group of people had the right to vote in colonial America?
    9·1 answer
  • DIARY OF A WIMPY KID
    8·2 answers
  • In the article, Hasan Kwame Jeffries says, “If you can’t understand America’s past, you can’t understand America’s present.” Ide
    11·1 answer
  • Why were some of the delegates concerned many states would not ratify the Constitution?
    14·1 answer
  • The two dominant political parties in American politics are the _______ and _______.
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!