1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
schepotkina [342]
2 years ago
9

ASAP plss is due today can someone help me answer 8 and 9 plss and thank you

Advanced Placement (AP)
1 answer:
Colt1911 [192]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

If you do your homework with outside help, you will hurt them badly emotionally and mentally. You will break not only their heart but also their mind and soul. You will destroy their trust, respect, hope, and dreams. You will cause them great sorrow and depression that might destroy their life.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What president is President Obama similar to?
Varvara68 [4.7K]

Answer:

a cool guy he help us a lot and made the nation better

Explanation:

he was cool

7 0
2 years ago
What is dispersal and elevation ?​
Kobotan [32]
Little is known about how mutualistic interactions affect the distribution of species richness on broad geographic scales. Because mutualism positively affects the fitness of all species involved in the interaction, one hypothesis is that the richness of species involved should be positively correlated across their range, especially for obligate relationships. Alternatively, if mutualisms involve multiple mutualistic partners, the distribution of mutualists should not necessarily be related, and patterns in species distributions might be more strongly correlated with environmental factors. In this study, we compared the distributions of plants and vertebrate animals involved in seed‐dispersal mutualisms across the United States and Canada. We compiled geographic distributions of plants dispersed by frugivores and scatter‐hoarding animals, and compared their distribution of richness to the distribution in disperser richness. We found that the distribution of animal dispersers shows a negative relationship to the distribution of the plants that they disperse, and this is true whether the plants dispersed by frugivores or scatter‐hoarders are considered separately or combined. In fact, the mismatch in species richness between plants and the animals that disperse their seeds is dramatic, with plants species richness greatest in the in the eastern United States and the animal species richness greatest in the southwest United States. Environmental factors were corelated with the difference in the distribution of plants and their animal mutualists and likely are more important in the distribution of both plants and animals. This study is the first to describe the broad‐scale distribution of seed‐dispersing vertebrates and compare the distributions to the plants they disperse. With these data, we can now identify locations that warrant further study to understand the factors that influence the distribution of the plants and animals involved in these mutualisms.

Introduction
A central problem in ecology is to understand the patterns and processes shaping the distribution of species. There is a preponderance of studies of species richness at broad geographic scales (Hawkins et al. 2003, Rahbek et al. 2007, Stein et al. 2014, Rabosky and Hurlbert 2015) that has facilitated our understanding of why species are found where they are, a central tenet within the domain of ecology (Scheiner and Willig 2008). Most commonly, these studies find species distributions to be correlated with resource availability and use environmental variables (e.g. temperature and productivity; Rabosky and Hurlbert 2015) to explain putative determinants of the distributions. Environmental variables are only one determinant of species’ distributions. Another, species interaction, is a key and understudied determinant of species’ distributions (Cazelles et al. 2016). In fact, in some cases species interactions may be more important for determining distribution than environmental variables (Fleming 2005).

When species interact, we expect their geographic distributions to be correlated – either positively or negatively – depending on the effect (or sign of the interaction) of one species on the other (Case et al. 2005). For pairwise interactions, where one species benefits from another species, a positive relationship is expected between the distribution and abundance due to the increase in the average fitness of the benefitting species where they overlap (Svenning et al. 2014). Furthermore, most species interactions are not simply pairwise, but diffuse, consisting of multiple interacting species, here referred to as guilds (with guilds referring to species that use the same resource). It therefore follows that where one guild benefits from another guild, a positive relationship is expected between the distribution and richness of the guids. This should be true in the case of mutualisms, where both sides of the interaction share an increase in average fitness from being together (Bronstein 2015), and there is some evidence for correlated geographic distributions of mutualists in the New World (Fleming 2005). One example of a mutualism where both sides of the interaction have a fitness advantage in each other's presence is animal‐mediated seed dispersal. Because both interacting species and guilds in seed dispersal mutualism benefit from the relationship we would predict that the richness of animal‐dispersed plants ought to be correlated with the richness of their animal dispersers and vice versa. To our knowledge, this prediction has never been tested on a large geographic scale.
3 0
3 years ago
27. In 1950, the world grain production was approximately 600 million tons. In 1994, the world grain harvest had risen to 1800 m
IgorLugansk [536]

Answer:

166.67%

Explanation:

The computation of the percentage increase in grain production for the period 1950-1955 is shown below:

= (Year 1995 grain production - Year 1950 grain production) ÷ ( Year 1950 grain production)

= (1,600 million tons - 600 million tons) ÷ (600 million tons)

= 1,000 million tons ÷ 600 million tons

= 166.67%

Hence the increase in percentage is 166.67%

5 0
3 years ago
Why did the court believe that Gideon could not defend himself?
Reil [10]
Gideon was an unexperienced man in terms of the law. He was underprepared and did not defend himself well. Hope this helps you.
8 0
3 years ago
What does gregarious mean is it a context clues or
larisa86 [58]

Answer:

A person fond of a company.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which statement is true of a market economy? A. It depends more on self-interest than a command economy does. B. It eliminates t
    14·2 answers
  • Which agent of erosion most likely formed the drumlins and finger lakes in New York State?
    10·1 answer
  • Isabel y Marta _______ traen. (frutas)
    14·2 answers
  • Psychologists working from biological perspectives are interested in
    15·2 answers
  • What is a perfect cover letter for a customer service representative
    13·1 answer
  • Robert is a financial planner who helps people create their personal finance goals. A friend whom he had previously helped to ge
    13·1 answer
  • Materials that are needed for soil roughening.
    10·1 answer
  • Explain one way that the removal of trees impacts nitrogen fixation.
    8·1 answer
  • 8. if she worked 40 hours and got 960$ How much money per hour does this employee make? *
    15·1 answer
  • ✝️WARNING JESUS✝️IS COMING✝️COPY AND PASTE THIS✝️DO MORE CAN SEE THIS✝️SHARE THE GOSPEL✝️JESUS IS KING
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!