Answer:
B. Kublai Khan was able to conquer all of China, while Genghis Khan
was not.
Explanation:
He was able to increase the empire and even conquer more. Compared to his father, he was really successful.
Better jobs & opportunities.
A push factor would be like famine or disease in the country, etc.
Answer:
If I was alive during the time Teddy Roosevelt was president, I would of had liked him, because, he saw the succesful campaigns of the Rough Riders in Cuba, helping to end the Spanish-American war, and, during his hunts, he proved he was a man of morals.
During one of his hunts he spared a baby bear cub from it's demise, which became international news. He also survived an assassination attempt, when delivering a speech, Teddy was shot before making the speech, but he just simply ignored it and continued the speech, and thats why I like Teddy Roosevelt.
Because thats showing that they can be trusted their already on lockdown so hell what else can they do
<span>The correct answer should definitely be the evidence they collect. Novels based on the past and citizen interviews are often subjective and don't represent actual historical facts. Journalists can present things more objectivelly but they are in the end opinions and opinions are subjective. Gathering facts and data is important for analyzing and interpreting history correctly.</span>
