Africa doesn't neither does Russia
The conclusion that can be drawn is that Nativists opposed i migration from Asian nations. This can be seen from the stereotypical Asian features of the person being punched, and how a similar person is in a place named “China Town”.
Here are why the other reasons are incorrect:
American citizens never were targets of discrimination during this time, unless you count immigrants who became citizens (but not white American nationals), but this is not the answer and the cartoon does not illustrate Americans being discriminated against.
Though Americans opposed immigration from some European nations, the political cartoon is targeting Asian immigrants.
Finally, nativists did not focus on native Americans (mainly immigrants) and this cartoon did not target Native Americans. However, it’s likely that nativists at the time disliked native Americans. (But the cartoon isn’t about that).
Hope this helps!
<span>The degree to which the king or queen holds absolute power under a monarchistic system of governance is always absolute. The king or queen has all say in terms of law, economics and military action when it comes to governing a land of people. Under this rule, the monarchs themselves believe that they have the "divine right" to hold the power that they do.</span>
Answer:
B, it is reflective of the ideals and interests of the people it represents.
Explanation:
I think it's C because that the bill of rights is the first 10 amendments of the constitution of America so it has nothing to do with monarchy's and it has nothing to do with officials of any church
