Answer:
Evidence is significant in a court proceeding because it helps the judge reach a valid decision based on the limited "crime evidence" placed before him/her.
*So it's also very important to give as much evidence as possible to support your case.*
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
A pesar de que no se anexan opciones o incisos para responder a la pregunta, podemos comentar lo siguiente.
¿Cómo el diálogo argumentativo que utiliza cordura nos permite razonar para sostener nuestras ideas?
Para poder sostener de manera firme nuestras ideas, los especialistas recomiendan usar la cordura en los diálogos y escritos argumentativos porque esa es la manera de mantener la "cabeza fría," es decir, la mente despejada para poder razonar lo que queremos decir, usando argumentos lógicos y explicativos que permitan a nuestras audiencias y lectores entender lo que tratamos de expresar.
Si ese llamado a la cordura, corremos el riesgo de dejarnos llevar por la emoción y con ello, usar opiniones que sean "viscerales," vagas, generales, que no aporten evidencia para respaldar lo que queremos transmitir.
La cordura nos dará la paciencia, la inteligencia y la razón para transmitir nuestras ideas de una manera metódica y lógica con objeto de que nuestras ideas fluyan con simpleza y puedan ser comprendidas.
W.E.B. Du Bois was born in Massachusetts in 1868. ... Du Bois briefly taught at a college in Ohio before he became the director of a major study on the social conditions of blacks in Philadelphia. He concluded from his research that white discrimination was the main reason that kept African Americans from good-paying jobs.
<span>The term that most effectively finishes this phrase is that of plaudits. In this passage, the narrator felt that the praise and motivation given by the coach was far more effective than the praise and applause that was being afforded to him or her by the crowd.</span>
