1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bulgar [2K]
3 years ago
9

"How did the British reaction to the Colonists' protests change

Law
1 answer:
liq [111]3 years ago
8 0
It was not a ‘British’ reaction - there was divided opinion in Britain as to how to respond and even in Parliament there were some who were in sympathy with the growing colonial resistance to British taxes. The Prime Minister was not one of them. The Stamp Act was an attempt to recover some of the great cost that the French and Indian War had incurred. The Intolerable Acts were a response to the resistance that the Stamp Act had met with. The Stamp Acts was a tax intended to revenue. The intolerable Acts were intended to curtail the growing resistance- by the time of the Intolerable Acts legislation was no longer focused on raising revenue but was focused on the resistance that trying to raise revenue had met with
You might be interested in
The Court has established a three-part test to define obscenity, including applying “local community standards” in determining w
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

Answer:

The Miller Test is the primary legal test for determining whether expression constitutes obscenity. It is named after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. California (1973). The Miller test faced its greatest challenge with online obscenity cases. In Ashcroft v. ACLU (2002), a case challenging the constitutionality of the Child Online Protection Act, several justices questioned the constitutionality of applying the local community standards of Miller to speech on the Internet. In this photo, Associate Legal Director of the ACLU Ann Beeson gestures during a news conference outside the Supreme Court on Tuesday, March 2, 2004 in Washington. The ACLU claimed COPA violated the First Amendment guarantee of free speech. They challenged the law on behalf of online bookstores, artists and others, including operators of Web sites that offer explicit how-to sex advice or health information. The Supreme Court agreed with the lower court’s ruling that COPA did not pass the strict scrutiny test used to judge obscenity cases. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, used with permission from the Associated Press)

Explanation:

d

6 0
3 years ago
So sánh Hệ thống pháp luật việt nam với học thuyế mác về pháp luật
uranmaximum [27]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
A paragraph about chief citizen
Talja [164]

Answer:

The president as chief citizen is supposed to be the face of the people, and represent his people as the popular leader. The president must be trustworthy and work for the public interest. The president must put the nations best interests above himself and one person or one group of people.

Examples

Picture

Here Clinton is making a speech to the people about whats currently going on.

CLICK ME FOR: Article This Article talks about Obama's visit to another country and how this visit affected the American citizens along with the citizens within Myanmar.

Obama standing up to the Congress to get American Citizens what they need. Job Growth.

Importance

The presidents job as Chief citizen is important because as the chief citizen he makes and builds trust with the people. He also shows the people how he expects them to act and tells them why, leading by example, is always important because those who have no idea where to go and what to do can always look at him and see where they need to be going. The presidents face is an important figure simply because the trust and feeling it brings up within people dictates how others act within the country and how those out of the country react.

5 0
3 years ago
Hey I need a little bit more help on my assignment this is a multiple-choice and I need to pick to please look at the picture !
melisa1 [442]

Answer: Pick the two last boxes

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
A petition or request for the lower court to send up it’s ruling -asking the court to hear their case is ?
Troyanec [42]

Answer:

certiorari

In law, certiorari is a court process to seek judicial review of a decision of a lower court or government agency. Certiorari comes from the name of an English prerogative writ, issued by a superior court to direct that the record of the lower court be sent to the superior court for review.Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the most important deterrent of classical theory?
    9·2 answers
  • The husband says: “I know what I’m doing. Its not my first time.” Why is his arugment a generalization?
    8·1 answer
  • Ralph received an inheritance of $30,000 from his aunt’s estate. He then bought a used sports car from Sid and paid $25,000 cash
    15·1 answer
  • The specific portion of the US Constitution which deals with the Federal Court System is _______.
    12·1 answer
  • Where does a consumer learn about the credit card interest rates in the schumer box?
    13·1 answer
  • ¿Cuales Son Los Fundamentos De Los Derechos Fundamentales?
    14·1 answer
  • Do you think all criminal cases should be heard by professionals and paid judges instead? Would this be better? Why?
    14·1 answer
  • Define the following
    15·1 answer
  • The U.S. Constitution establishes the United States as a
    15·1 answer
  • By physically committing an act of robbery, the defendant has satisfied which of the requirement of ______ necessary for a convi
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!