1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Snezhnost [94]
3 years ago
9

Uncertainty Reduction Theory poses ________, or truisms drawn from past research and common sense, to explain the process of red

ucing uncertainty in initial interactions.
Social Studies
1 answer:
lara [203]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Uncertainty Reduction Theory poses <u>axioms</u>, or truisms drawn from past research and common sense, to explain the process of reducing uncertainty in initial interactions.

You might be interested in
NEED ASAP!!Please help! What advantages come from centralizing the government as Emperor Qin did in 221 BC. Do the advantages of
DaniilM [7]

Answer: Control and Accountability

Explanation: When centralized leaders are in charge of all major decisions they retain more control over company operations and development of its culture. Additionally, little question exists over who is accountable for the results of those decisions. If the company gets a bad price in a supplier negotiation, top managers know to turn to the head buyer to get a sense of what went wrong. This accountability causes top managers to drive each other to peak performance.

4 0
3 years ago
A growing number of studies confirm that playing violent video games increases the likelihood of aggressive behavior. does not s
Delicious77 [7]
(A) Increases the likelihood of aggressive behavior.


source https://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/02/12/science/studying-the-effects-of-playing-violent-video-games.html?pagewanted=all&




"A dose of violent gaming makes people act a little more rudely than they would otherwise"
5 0
4 years ago
How does previous political experience and perceived perception by American voters influence elections?
HACTEHA [7]

Answer:

When asked which statement comes closer to their own views, most Americans (58%) say that “voting gives people like me some say about how government runs things,” while fewer (39%) say “voting by people like me doesn’t really affect how government runs things.”

The public is somewhat more skeptical when it comes to the ability of ordinary citizens to influence the government in Washington. Half (50%) say ordinary citizens can do a lot to influence the government in Washington, if they are willing to make the effort, while about as many (47%) say there’s not much ordinary citizens can do to influence the government.

Can ordinary people have an impact?

Majorities of Democrats and Democratic leaners as well as of Republicans and Republican leaners say that voting gives people some say in government, though this view is somewhat more widely held among Democrats (63%) than Republicans (56%).Those with more education are more likely to say voting gives them a voice in government

Democrats are similarly more likely than Republicans to say ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington: 55% of Democrats say ordinary citizens can make an impact, while 42% say there is not much ordinary people can do. About as many Republicans and leaners say ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington (47%) as say there’s not much ordinary citizens can do (51%).

Among the 13% of the public that does not identify or lean toward either party – a group that is far less likely to be registered to vote – just 44% say voting gives people some say in how government runs things, while 49% say it doesn’t really affect how government runs things.

Seven-in-ten of those with a post-graduate degree (70%) and 65% of those with a college degree say voting gives people some say in government; somewhat smaller shares of those with only some college experience (58%) or those with no more than a high school diploma (51%) say the same.

Unlike views on voting, there are no educational differences in the shares saying ordinary people can influence government if they make the effort.Scale of political efficacy

Blacks (58%) and Hispanics (57%) are more likely than whites (47%) to say that ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington, if they’re willing to make the effort. There are no racial differences in views of the impact of voting.

These two measures of opinion on the impact of voting and on ordinary citizens’ ability to influence the government in Washington can be combined to create a scale of political efficacy. Those who rank “high” on the scale say both that voting gives people some say in how government runs things and that ordinary citizens can do a lot to influence the government in Washington, if they are willing to make the effort. “Medium” political efficacy includes those who hold only one of the two views, while “low” political efficacy describes those who do not hold either view.

Overall, 39% of the public falls into the high political efficacy category, while 33% have medium political efficacy and 28% have low political efficacy.

Political efficacy is higher among those with more education. For example, 47% of those with a post-graduate degree rank high on the scale of political efficacy, compared with 33% of those with no more than a high school diploma.

5 0
3 years ago
Once a company has decided to enter the global marketplace, it must select a means of market entry. Four general options exist:
inysia [295]

Answer:

(3) Joint venture

Explanation:

Once a company has decided to enter the global marketplace, it must select a means of market entry. Four general options exist: (1) exporting; (2) licensing; (3) <u>joint venture</u>; and (4) direct investment.

Joint venture refers to <u>an association that occurs between two companies that are usually located in different countries, in which they combine marketing strategies in order to increase their revenues and enter the global marketplace.</u>

An example is the joint venture of General Motors–Suzuki. This "alliance" was <u>extremely beneficial for both companies</u>, as it allowed Suzuki to access both American and European markets, while General Motors employees learned important Japanese manufacturing methods.

3 0
4 years ago
When all justices agree on a decision and the reasoning behind it, the Court may issue a
larisa [96]

Answer:

Dissenting Opinion

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When researchers monitored the professional accomplishments of more than 1500 highly intelligent individuals, they found that th
    14·1 answer
  • Which leader s followers were called the black shirts?
    6·1 answer
  • When can people break the social contract?
    6·1 answer
  • How is creativity measured?
    11·1 answer
  • _____ is a normal state in which the hypnotized person behaves the way he or she believes that a hypnotized person should behave
    15·1 answer
  • What were public schools in New England set up to do?
    14·2 answers
  • The southern economy ________________ from the damages of the civil war.
    8·1 answer
  • Which best describes Jefferson’s response to the handling of the Whiskey Rebellion?
    6·1 answer
  • For this is why the gospel was preached even to those who are dead, that though judged in the flesh the way people are, they mig
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT one of the three conceptualizations of
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!