Answer:
Look below
Explanation:
It is a process that involves rearrangement of the molecular or ionic structure of a substance, as opposed to a change in physical form or a nuclear reaction.
Hope it helps!!
After reading the scenario, we can say the following about Camilla's probable actions at level 2 of moral development:
At level 2 of her moral development, Camilla would most likely report the theft.
Perhaps, in order to help the hungry person, she would give him/her food herself. But still, since at level 2 she has internalized society's moral standards and rules, she would report the theft because that is the right thing to do according to society.
- This question refers to Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development, which is comprised of 3 levels. At the second level, which is the level Camilla is at, we accept the notion of right and wrong given to us by others in society.
The three levels are:
1.<u> Preconventional level</u>: when children still have no sense of morality and their decisions are guided by adults.
2. Conventional level: when children accept the moral code and the sense of right and wrong she has learned. Most adults remain at this level.
3.<u> Postconventional level:</u> when the person understands universal ethical principles but makes her own judgments based on her own individual sense of right and wrong.
- If Camilla is at the second level, she will most likely conform to society's rules and expectations.
- That does not mean she can't understand that there is a hungry person in need. She will likely help this person too, but that will not prevent her from reporting the crime.
- In conclusion, having the above information in mind, we can answer that Camilla might report the theft and help the hungry person.
Learn more about the subject here:
brainly.com/question/6470690?referrer=searchResults
brainly.com/question/4309262?referrer=searchResults
The Scopes Trial, also known as the Scopes Monkey Trial, was the 1925 prosecution of science teacher John Scopes for teaching evolution in a Tennessee public school, which a recent bill had made illegal. The trial featured two of the best-known orators of the era, William Jennings Bryan and Clarence Darrow, as opposing attorneys. The trial was viewed as an opportunity to challenge the constitutionality of the bill, to publicly advocate for the legitimacy of Darwin’s theory of evolution, and to enhance the profile of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
No charges at all even though he was the most mysterious out of them all he was the one with the most sense sort of angel like
