Ernesto Miranda vs Arizona

History

1 answer:

trasher [3.6K]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Miranda v. Arizona: After Miranda’s conviction was overturned by the Supreme Court, the State of Arizona retried him. At the second trial, Miranda’s confession was not introduced into evidence. Miranda was once again convicted and sentenced to 20-30 years in prison.

he Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda v. Arizona addressed four different cases involving custodial interrogations. In each of these cases, the defendant was questioned by police officers, detectives, or a prosecuting attorney in a room in which he was cut off from the outside world. In none of these cases was the defendant given a full and effective warning of his rights at the outset of the interrogation process.

Explanation:

Gimme that brainlest boyyy

You might be interested in

1. How would the ERA have fared if ratifying an amendment had required only a three-fifths majority of states? What about a two-

monitta

Answer:

If 2/3 of the states had ratified the ERA amendment it would have been approved.

Explanation:

The reason behind this is the fifth article of the constitution. Because it says that congress has to pass any amendment or bill that has at least two-thirds of the states approving it to be sent to the senate and to each state congress to be adopted as the state legislature. However if it passes by three fourths it goes straight to the constitution as an amendment.

4 0

3 years ago

Mention some characteristics if cricket

Fantom [35]

Dark brown or black
lives in grass
rubs legs together to get women

8 0

3 years ago

During his third voyage to the New World, Columbus realized that he had discovered a new continent, and had not sailed to island

Temka [501]

False, also please mark me as the brainliest

8 0

4 years ago