South Carolina and other Southern states argued that the tariff was unconstitutional and were opposed to the more recent protectionist tariffs because they would have to pay for them. On the other hand, Northern states were in favor of the tariffs because they helped strengthen their industrial-based economies.
<h3>Why did South Carolina think it was entitled to overturn the tariff law?</h3>
The South Carolina convention's "nullifiers," led by Andrew Jackson's vice president Calhoun, declared that the 1828 and 1832 tariff acts were unconstitutional and should be nullified. Representatives from South Carolina were of the opinion that these tariffs benefited the North and put an excessive strain on the South's economy.
<h3>Why was South Carolina so outraged about the 1828 Tariff?</h3>
The southern states were furious when Congress passed a high protective tariff in 1828 because they believed it would only benefit the industrialized north. British textiles, for instance, became more expensive as a result of a high import tariff. American cloth manufacturers, primarily those in the north, benefited from this tariff.
Learn more about South Carolina here:
brainly.com/question/971950
#SPJ1
Answer:
D. The Scientific Revolution
Explanation:
<3
Answer:
Philadelphia: s.n., 1787. Library of Congress, Rare Book and Special Collections Division. The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was called to revise the ailing Articles of Confederation. However, the Convention soon abandoned the Articles, drafting a new Constitution with a much stronger national government.
To get the throne of England, William and Mary had signed the English Bill of Rights. With this bill signed, the state was able to regain the crown and avoid the conflicts that were caused by the parliament. The bill signified that England remains to under Roman Catholicism.
Answer:
There were a number of pressing issues debated during the presidential campaign. The major foreign policy debate revolved around the appropriate American response to the French Revolution. Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans were sympathetic to France, while the Federalists leaned more toward Britain, fearing the growing radicalism of the French Revolution and attempting to prevent the United States from being drawn into the conflict. The Federalist party’s pro-British stance led to accusations that Adams and his compatriots were seeking to undo the political effects of the American Revolution and restore the monarchy.The Alien and Sedition Acts, which John Adams had signed into law in 1798, were another point of contention. The acts made it more difficult for immigrants to become US citizens, and included a provision criminalizing false statements critical of the federal government. This provision was squarely aimed at the Democratic-Republican opposition, which had been sharply critical of Adams and the Federalists. Critics of the Alien and Sedition Acts, many of them Democratic-Republicans, charged that they were unconstitutional and violated the First Amendment right to free speech. While the Democratic-Republicans were well-organized and effective, the Federalist party suffered from a split between John Adams and Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton penned a 54-page letter denouncing Adams, and it hurt the Federalist cause when it was published after falling into the hands of a Democratic-Republican. The campaigns were bitter and divisive, with both sides launching heated accusations, vilifying each other, and engaging in slander and character assassination. Adams and Jefferson, former friends and compatriots, had become bitter enemies.
Explanation:
