Answer:
data set 1 : the mean is (1+2+4+4+5+5+6+7+9+9+9+11) / 12 = 72/12 = 6the MAD is :1 - 6 = -5....|-5| = 52 - 6 = -4....|-4| = 44 - 6 = -2...|-2| = 24 - 6 = -2...|-2| = 25 - 6 = -1...|-1| = 15 - 6 = -1...|-1| = 16 - 6 = 0 ...| 0| = 07 - 6 = 1....|1| = 19 - 6 = 3...|3| = 39 - 6 = 3...|3| = 39 - 6 = 3...|3| = 311 - 6 = 5...|5| = 5(5+4+2+2+1+1+0+1+3+3+3+5) / 12 = 30/12 = 2.5 <== the MAD2nd data set :the mean is (1+3+4+6+6+6+7+9+9+10+10+13) / 12 = 84/12 = 7mad is :1 - 7 = -6...| -6| = 63 - 7 = -4...|-4| = 44 - 7 = -3...|-3| = 36 - 7 = -1...|-1| = 16 - 7 = -1..|-1| = 16 - 7 = -1..|-1| = 17 - 7 = 0...|0| = 09 - 7 = 2...|2| = 29 - 7 = 2...|2| = 210 - 7 = 3..|3| = 310 - 7 = 3...|3| = 313 - 7 = 6...|6| = 6(6+4+3+1+1+1+0+2+2+3+3+6) / 12 = 32/12 = 2.67 <== the MADthe difference of the means is 1. This value is less then half of the mean absolute deviation of either data set. <== ur answer
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
69
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer : 1.05 . Hope I helped have a good day :)
There is not enough information to calculate this.
<span>Knowing the weight ratio of the fox to coyote as 3:8 in no way allows you to know the respective ratio of the wolf. To know the weight of the wolf would require knowing its ratio value, then the weights of all 3 is an easy calculation. </span>
<span>Example - 3:8:15 (f:c:w) is a plausible ratio based upon real-world weight averages for certain species/subspecies of the three. </span>
<span>- knowing the values of the 3 terms as 3:8:15 gives a total of 3+8+15 = 26 ratio values </span>
<span>- you then simply divide the total weight by this ratio value total; 120/26 = 4.62 </span>
<span>- so each ratio value is 4.62 units of weight*** </span>
<span>- now, simply calculate the weight of each canid by multiplying its ratio value by the unit of weight... </span>
<span>fox; 3 x 4.62 = 13.86 </span>
<span>coyote; 8 x 4.62 = 36.96 </span>
<span>wolf; 15 x 4.62 = 69.3 </span>
<span>Validate the ratios by adding the weights together (we should get 120) 13.86 + 36.96 + 69.3 = 120.12 </span>
<span>The total is slightly out because that 4.62 figure was a rounding up. </span>
<span>Now, the thing is, there is nothing given that allows us to know exactly what ratio value the wolf should be, I chose 15 myself because that is a real-world plausible value when compared to 3:8 for the other 2. Changing it to 16, say, means that there are now 27 ratio values total giving a ratio value of 120/27 = 4.44 obviously changing the weights of all 3.</span>
4^7=16,384 i used a calulator