Answer:
Those who defend the use of animals in research contend that nonhuman animals are enough like humans to make them scientifically adequate models of humans, but different enough to make it morally acceptable to experiment on them. In addition to the ethical objections to causing suffering to other sentient species, inherent issues with animal models including differences from humans in both size and physiology, genetic differences, and variations in biological targets limit the ability of data collected from an animal model to be translated to people.
<h2>
HOPE I HELP U</h2>
Answer:
school rules are similar to federal laws because they both (try) to restrict people from doing harmful or bad things. A typical American high school with out rules, or any consequences for breaking them would be anarchy. Kids could bully one another, fight each other, ruin school property with spray paint, fire, etc. They also might not do their homework, or school work in general. It depends on the kid with out rules. Some kids might go crazy, some kids might stay calm and collected.
Answer:
Explanation:
When we say a law is normative, we mean two things. On the one hand, it means the particular law was made according to the procedure laid down for its making. This is technical validity or normativity of the law, falling within the pure theory of law by Hans Kelsen. On the other hand, a law is normative if it has some moral content in it.