Answer:
c
Explanation:
law enforcement fire a potentially used murder firearm into the water to preserve a gun tracing that is left on the bullet due to the barrels gratings into the bullet
Answer:
The answer would be the Federal Court.
Explanation:
This is because the Federal Court covers the whole united states, and the State Court only covers a specific state.
I hope this helped!
The mindset of using derogatory terms for people identifying themselves as bisexuals and then neglecting it by not calling it as sexual harassment would be illogical and wrong.
People of LGBTQ community are creations of God and any comments on them would be counted against humanity and basic human dignity. Bisexuality refers to the sexual attraction or intimate behavior towards both males and females. Such comments would be uncomfortable for most people, and it may also create hostile environment that causes sexual harassment to people of this community, and they may find them in isolation or depression. Sexual remarks on anyone could be valued as discrimination and violation of human integrity and dignity. It creates a negative impact on the young minds, and they can turn abusive to such people and so it is necessary that such remarks are avoided completely.
Learn more about Sexual harassment at:
brainly.com/question/9647226
#SPJ4
Answer:
Philo Taylor Farnsworth (August 19, 1906 – March 11, 1971) was an American inventor and television pioneer.[2][3] He made many crucial contributions to the early development of all-electronic television.[4] He is best known for his 1927 invention of the first fully functional all-electronic image pickup device (video camera tube), the image dissector, as well as the first fully functional and complete all-electronic television system.[5][6] Farnsworth developed a television system complete with receiver and camera—which he produced commercially through the Farnsworth Television and Radio Corporation from 1938 to 1951, in Fort Wayne, Indiana
Proximate cause represents the proposition that a negligent party is legally liable only for the foreseeable risk that they cause.
A proximate cause, as used in both law and insurance, is an event that is sufficiently connected to an injury for the courts to recognize it as the injury's primary cause. The legal system distinguishes between proximate (also known as legal) cause and cause-in-fact. The "but for" test is used to identify cause-in-fact: Without the action, the outcome would not have occurred. (For instance, if the driver had not run the red light, the collision would not have happened.) Although the action is a necessary precondition for the injury, it might not be sufficient in and of itself. There are a few situations where the but for test is useless.
Learn more about Proximate cause, here
brainly.com/question/13885854
#SPJ4
