The two persons indicated above (Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams) were at some point in the history of America presidential candidates. One of them went on to win the elections because of their economic backgrounds. See the explanation below.
<h3>How were Adams and Jackson's backgrounds different, and how did they compare to those of earlier presidents?</h3>
The process of choosing a president in America altered in the year 1807. Only wealthy men could vote in prior elections, and as a result, whomever promised greater riches was chosen president.
The sort of candidate who won the election changed once the average person was allowed to vote in 1807.
Because the average person could vote in the election of 1828, they took advantage of the chance and chose whoever they believed would benefit them. As can be seen, the candidate who was more relatable to the electorate prevailed.
Overall, Jackson was favored over Adams by the populace because he could connect with them better and represented the American ideal.
Learn more about Andrew Jackson:
brainly.com/question/340840
#SPJ1
Answer: The Jutes
Explanation: One of the Germanic tribes that landed in the United Kingdom after the Romans departed
Well, in the first World War, Germany lost the war because of the Jewish. Another reason would be that Hitler used myths and lies, and used anti-semitism to his advantage, with myths like how the Jews killed Jesus Christ(when it was actually the Romans) So because of religious prejudice and a long history of anti-semitism made them prime targets.
