Answer:
Daniel’s team had to decide the vendor on the following attributes that should be analyzed:
- Innovation :- Credit Issue Group is a money related assistance organization and henceforth the seller needs to have a decent mechanical base to furnish with organization with required administrations on schedule and best in quality.
- Exclusivity: Considering the significance of the administrations, organization may take a gander at the restrictiveness of the administrations that merchant can offer to Credit Issue.
-
Complimentary Services offering:- To look if seller has some other contributions to make to the customer that might be complimentary with the fundamental administrations advertised. This can save money on schedule and authoritative work.
-
Support:- What support would vendor be able to offer to the organization alongside giving the essential administrations.
-
Contingency:- in case of seller's framework disappointment, what back up merchant needs to proceed with uninterrupted administrations.
Answer: Procedures
Explanation:
From the given case/scenario, we can state that the standing plan can be referred to as <em>procedures</em>. A procedure is referred to as a document or act that is written in order to support a policy. It is mostly designed in order to describe where,who, what, when, and why through means of building corporate accountability in inclination to implementation of the policy.
Answer: Marginal revenue is equal to price times quantity
Explanation:
A perfectly competitive market is a market where there's a large number of both the producers and the consumers have full and symmetric information.
In a perfectly competitive market, the marginal revenue is the same as price and the marginal revenue curve is the same as the demand curve facing sellers.
It should be noted that the statement that the marginal revenue is equal to price times quantity is incorrect. The total revenue is equal to price times quantity.
<span>In this case, the transfer could be considered voidable by the trustees. This is because Shirley did not receive the fair value for the car, but simply received a negligible amount as a way of trying to defraud her creditors. In this case, the transfer could be voided.</span>
SLPS trade securities on their own behalf (not for someone else).
