Answer:
The Miranda right is from the 5th amendment. This is because in 1966, the supreme court decided the historic case; Miranda v. Arizona, declared that if a person is taken into police custody, before questioning he/she must be informed by the 5th amendment.
Explanation:
Answer:
By the time of the First Dynasty, international trade had been initiated with the regions of the Levant, Libya, and Nubia. Egypt had a trading colony in Canaan, a number in Syria, and even more in Nubia.
Explanation:
In a study by Briol and Petty, participants were exposed to strong or weak arguments on a topic while either shaking their heads or nodding their heads. A person would be more persuaded if they were shaking their head while listening to a flimsy argument.
Not all fallacious are inherently weak arguments. Because it is unfounded, an argument may be poor. Solving a mathematical equation is a classic example; if you made a mistake in the proof, it would not be regarded as "weak argument," just invalid. Because you only need to check for logical mistakes throughout the deductive process, invalid arguments are frequently simpler to identify.
A weak argument can't be flawed if it is based on untrue premises. For instance, "Video game playing encourages violent behaviour. This person spends a lot of time playing video games, so violence is probably in their future. The weak argument that playing video games is associated with violence is false, thus even though the argument is compelling, it is still flawed.
Learn more about weak argument here
brainly.com/question/13576121
#SPJ4
The correct answer: Due to the doctrine of "Double Jeopardy"
Explanation: In Ball v. United States, the Supreme Court articulated a general doctrine wherein the State gets one swing at trying someone for a particular crime. If they can't prove it, they need to move on.
