<span>Either
to listen or to contemplate. Listen to what the speaker has got to say, to hear
and feel the emotions he is trying to convey, to criticize his speech either positively
or negatively. Contemplate to the lessons or learnings they have gathered upon listening.
They are trying to recall the experiences they had before, connect it to the
speech, find meaning with it and apply it in their daily lives. Or they are
simply in awe of how the speech got in touch with their feelings.</span>
A person can think however they want. Actions, like many have said, define a person in the end. Someone can advocate for peace with malicious intent, but they will still likely be remembered for advocating peace and not for their impure motivations. If these contradicting images are revealed to the public, that is still an act against that person, and is no longer a thought.
However, this is only from the public's view. When it comes to people, they may as well be the embodiment of their thoughts. Everything is fueled by something. The same person who seeds their own goals under the guise of peace will not think of themselves as one who acts with the intentions of bringing peace. They will be looking to call forth whatever it is that they want, and be aware that what they present to the public is not the truth.
So, both points are arguable. It depends on whether you value the individual or the community. Actions are what are remembered, and thoughts are a person's reason. Even today, this comes into relevancy because people want to know why certain figures in history did what they did. Thoughts make a person human, after all. Without thought, seperation of man and beast would be nigh impossible. Without action, man would have been left behind long ago. Both thought and action are important indeed.
Hyperbole because she says she dying it tell someone something, it’s an exaggeration
Answer:
<h3><em><u>Are </u></em></h3>
Explanation:
<em><u>T</u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>e </u></em><em><u>letters </u></em><em><u>,</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>as </u></em><em><u>well </u></em><em><u>as </u></em><em><u>the</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>postcards</u></em><em><u>,</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>are </u></em><em><u>on </u></em><em><u>the</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>table</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
Answer:
in some cases even "good" stereotypes cant be good ones