B. I think not 100% positive but I tried my best
Answer:
1. italicize
2. enclose in quotation marks
3. italicize
4. enclose in quotation marks
5. enclose in quotation marks
Explanation:
ur welcome :)
I wish there were any answer choices if there were any but the answer is - to define the purpose of the essay and show whos point of view it is.
Answer: It supported the District Court’s decision that the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Explanation:
The case of Ingraham v. Wright was heard in 1976 in the Supreme court based on an event that happened in 1970 where James Ingraham was paddled by the principal of a public high school in Florida to the point of needing medical assistance.
The district court the case was first heard in dismissed it and the Court of Appeals upheld this dismissal.
The Supreme court then agreed with the District court in saying that corporal punishment did not infringe upon Constitutional rights so the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
The answer would be D, it is half of what it was before.
