Answer:
There should be no contract formed between Newsnow and Ollie.
Explanation:
To form a contract, there should be 03 essential elements which are an offer; an acceptance and an consideration the offeror gives the offeree once the contract has been delivered.
For the purpose of this question, putting aside the examination of the 02 essential elements which are an offer and an acceptance, given there are lack of certain consideration in Newsnow advertisement, there are lack of one essential element for the contract to be formed. In other words, there are no "meetings of mind" in this scenario, thus it is quite certain there is no contract between Newsno and Ollie.
A) acceptable, provided the securities are used as collateral for the loan and the loan conforms to the provisions of Regulation T.
B) acceptable, provided the loan is made under the provisions of Regulation T of the Federal Reserve.
C) unethical.
D) acceptable, provided the securities are used as collateral for the loan.
Answer: Unethical
Explanation: Based on the model and policy of the North America Securities Administrator's Association, the investment adviser cannot lend money to a customer to purchase recommended securities under the guise of being partners, such behavior is deemed UNETHICAL and in violation of the rule binding the practices and investment advisers and investment adviser representatives.
Customers can purchase securities by taking loans from recommended or regulated lender, broker or bank.
If a test is being used to make a dichotomous decision (e. G. , suitable or unsuitable for the job), the cutting marks the point of decision.
<h3>What is the usefulness of cut off mark in a test?</h3>
cut off mark in a test is been used in the selection process after the test which is very important in the point of decision.
And this will be necessary to get the good hand for the job when the test is being used to make a dichotomous decision.
Learn more about cut off mark at:brainly.com/question/25997960
#SPJ12
Please do not post the same question so many times. It makes it difficult for us to help other people. Thanks
The solution for the problem follows:
Expense = variable expenses * quantity of produced + fixed
expenses
= 14q + 78,490
= 14 (3500) + 78, 490
= 49000 + 78,490
= $127, 490 is the total expense for 3,500 tennis rackets
Get the per piece expense by dividing 127,490 to 3500
Expense per piece = 127,490 / 3500
= $36.43
<span> </span>
