...he believed in the limited use of federal power but also that states were not truly sovereign.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Yes the legislative compromises are the attempt by the federal governments to solve the moral issues. But unfortunately they end up failing very miserably in the long run and they are also criticized eventually to contradict each other. As we saw in the Missouri Compromise and Kansas-Nebraska Act, when the two compromises ending up contradicting each other by allowing slavery in the new territory of Kansas. The Missouri Compromise stated that 30 years before, slavery had been prohibited in the territories north to the southern border of Missouri.
One of the good thing about the legislative compromise is that though the issue is prominent enough in the society, the government is still willing to spend time working out for a solution that they think will fix the problem.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
A is incorrect; In the 1800's the US was still new, so that doesn't make sense.
B is incorrect; If there were fewer voting districts, then the graph would be declining.
D is incorrect; If it represented fewer, then the graph would be declining.
Using process of elimination, C is the only answer.
-hope it helps
An economic interest group works to gain economic advantages for its members
Answer:
The attitudes of Confederate civilians fluctuated in opposition to those of Unionists in the state. For Confederates, Union military advances spurred anger and soul-searching while each Confederate victory deepened their faith in ultimate victory and spurred enthusiasm for sustaining the war.
please mark as Brainliest and please say thank you.
