Answer:
The author wants to highlight the fact that food waste can be addressed in the same way as other waste.
Explanation:
In this text, the author employs juxtaposition by presenting two contrasting ideas in order to encourage a comparison. The author first presents the idea of the recycling of paper, aluminum, glass, and plastic. He states that the community has done a great job with these objects. He then states that now is time to do the same with food waste. The purpose of such a contrast is to highlight the fact that food waste can be addressed in the same way as other waste.
Part A.
Answer: There have been many, but they have all failed.
Explanation: Henry brings up their past experience with the British, and point out they never had a successful reconciliation. "And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House."
Part B.
Answer: He asks questions and then answers them to lead the audience.
Explanation: He asks questions such as "Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation?" to support his argument that the British cannot be trusted if they are bringing troops.
Answer:
B. measuring an amount.
Explanation:
In order to understand what quantitative means, you have to understand what quantity means. That comes from the Old French word <em>quantite</em>, which is from the Latin <em>quantitas</em> (as you mentioned with quantitative.). <em>Quantitas</em> comes from <em>quantas</em>, meaning "how great" or "how much." "-ive" is just an adjective-forming suffix. Of the choices, B is the only one showing "amount", so B. measuring an amount is the answer.
B. He uses parallelism with the repetition of the word too. This is the correct option. He criticizes the role of the previous Democrats' state: too large, too bureaucratic, too wasteful".
A- He does not use any logical argument.
C-He does not mention any political achievement of his.
D- He does not underestimate the Americans' emotions.
Answer:
No its not ok to break the law, these laws have been created for a reason, to protect us and help us in society, so is it ever ok, no! We live in the most greatest country and our laws mean something, we also have people who enforce those laws to help us be safe, so no it is never ok to break the law and if you do, you will be punished
Explanation: