I mean whats the text about, u need more detail
Answer:
Extravagant hypothesis.
Explanation:
Fallacies represent the error/flaw in reasoning that spoils the validity of the argument. An extravagant hypothesis is a kind of fallacy that occurs when an exaggerated or unlikely explanation or comparison is provided unnecessarily where a simpler or less elaborate description could work more efficiently. <em>Similarly, this example proposes an extravagant comparison(with 'aliens') that represents a flaw in logical reasoning(comparison here) </em>that neglects the effectiveness of the intended meaning. Thus, it exemplifies the 'extravagant hypothesis' fallacy.
From your choices, the answer to your question that is Which person was NOT on the pilgrimage in the Prologue to The Canterbury Tales? Is the Reeve. The second option is the best and most correct answer to your question because the other options were on the pilgrimage in the story.
Answer:
The effect that Saukko’s objective tone has in the sentence “we should generate as much waste as possible from substances such as uranium-238, which has a half-life … of one million years” is a sarcastic tone.
Explanation:
She develops her passage through a variety of methods to poison the earth. Deep-well injections of toxic substances, contamination of surface water, and pollution through combustion and evaporation are a few of the solutions regarding poisoning the earth. She uses sarcasim to try and reach out and get the people who want to poison the earth to fall for it.
Answer:
how are you?
have you met the girl you were talking about?
whats your ideal type?
Explanation:
hehe that's it for me :^)
