1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nignag [31]
2 years ago
15

What is an example from your reading of a civil case in federal court?

History
1 answer:
Charra [1.4K]2 years ago
7 0
Federal civil rights claims, antitrust actions, and copyright and pa ten t cases.
You might be interested in
Who did the Portuguese defeat to<br> gain power in the Indian Ocean?
Paladinen [302]

Answer:

THE PORTUGUESE IN THE INDIAN OCEAN 1497-1557. In 1497 the Portuguese exploded onto the scene in the Indian Ocean. They came first as explorers and stayed as conquerors. ... But, by controlling the entrances and exits to and from the area, Portugal could dominate the area economically and control the spice trade.

Explanation:

Hoped this helped :)

4 0
3 years ago
explain how the Wilmot Proviso was so controversial in raising the debate over the slave issue again to such intense levels.
Pachacha [2.7K]

The Whigs faced a different scenario. The victory of James K. Polk (Democrat) over Henry Clay (Whig) in the 1844 presidential election had caught the southern Whigs by surprise. The key element of this defeat, which carried over into the congressional and local races in 1845 and 1846 throughout the South, was the party's failure to take a strong stand favoring Texas annexation. Southern Whigs were reluctant to repeat their mistakes on Texas, but, at the same time, Whigs from both sections realized that victory and territorial acquisition would again bring out the issue of slavery and the territories. In the South in particular, there was already the realization, or perhaps fear, that the old economic issues that had defined the Second Party System<span> were already dead. Their political goal was to avoid any sectional debate over slavery which would expose the sectional divisions within the party.</span>After an earlier attempt to acquire Texas by treaty had failed to receive the necessary two-thirds approval of the Senate, the United States annexed the Republic of Texas by a joint resolution of Congress that required simply a majority vote in each house of Congress. President John Tyler signed the bill on March 1, 1845, a few days before his term ended. As many expected, the annexation led to war with Mexico. After the capture of New Mexico and California in the first phases of the war, the political focus shifted to how much territory would be acquired from Mexico. The key to this was the determination of the future status of slavery in any new territory.

Both major political parties had labored long to keep divisive slavery issues out of national politics. The Democrats had generally been successful in portraying those within their party attempting to push a purely sectional issue as extremists that were well outside the normal scope of traditional politics.[2] However, midway through Polk's term, Democratic dissatisfaction with the administration was growing within the Martin Van Buren, or Barnburner, wing of the Democratic Party over other issues. Many felt that Van Buren had been unfairly denied the party's nomination in 1844 when southern delegates resurrected a convention rule, last used in 1832, requiring that the nominee had to receive two-thirds of the delegate votes. Many in the North were also upset with the Walker tariff which reduced the tariff rates; others were opposed to Polk's veto of a popular river and harbor improvements bill, and still others were upset over the Oregon settlement with Great Britain where it appeared that Polk did not pursue the northern territory with the same vigor he used to acquire Texas. Polk was seen more and more as enforcing strict party loyalty primarily to serve southern interests. Hope This Helps! Can I have Brainliest? Please:)

7 0
2 years ago
Which of the following best describes the kinds of decisions that result from
yaroslaw [1]

Answer:

an outcome with benefits that are greater than the costs

so b.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the Magna Carta do for the first time (in England) in 1215?
Vilka [71]

Answer:

It established that royalty were also subject to the law.

4 0
2 years ago
Where did the name HeLa come from?
Dmitrij [34]

Answer:

It came from the name Henrietta Lacks

Explanation:

Hope I helped

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Define the term Qur’an
    12·1 answer
  • How were the intolerable acts different from the earlier stamp act and the townshend acts? what response did these actions provo
    8·1 answer
  • Beginning in the 1600s the Tokugawa shoguns who ruled Japan tried to maintain stability and order by
    11·2 answers
  • The government suspended competitive bidding and instituted what policy to gain support of business leaders?
    6·1 answer
  • The axum civilization used
    14·1 answer
  • How was the Middle Kingdom different from the old kingdom
    10·1 answer
  • How did hammurabi conquer Mesopotamia?
    6·1 answer
  • How was education reform in South Carolina different from education reform in the rest of the country?
    14·1 answer
  • How did John Adams and Thomas Jefferson differ in their beliefs?
    15·1 answer
  • During World War II, the United States fought a war on two fronts, which of the following correctly describes the war on two fro
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!