The League of Nations was formed to unify many countries. It wasn't very efficient. The United Nations was essentially an improved version of the League of Nations.
Answer:
A divided regional identity (with a bit of national unity) developed.
Explanation:
Politics: Some contributed (voting rights) to unity, others (nullification) clearly divided the country.
Economics: Market revolution was a bit of both but Tariffs and the clash between the industrial north and the agricultural south was dividing the country and contributed to a regional identity.
Foreign Policy: The war of 1812 united the country; the westward expansion was uniting and dividing at the same time.
As we take in account that Economics is always the most important thing for the general public, the regional identity grew more than the national unity did.
Nope!! most historians have a bias, causing them to write history the way they saw it, often adding in their own opinions. for example, bartolome de las casas wrote about columbus, and was obviously against what he did.
It might be said that the French explorers learnt how to make boats suitable for the coastal waters, rivers and lakes when they were at the great Lakes. They decided to build small sailing- ships to travel the entire length of the Missouri and the Mississippi River to New Orleans on the golf of Mexico. They built <span>native birch-bark canoes and large rafts.</span>
