0 to 90 west. I hope this is the correct answer
Answer:
<em>The Ottoman economy was disrupted by inflation, caused by the influx of precious metals into Europe from the Americas and by an increasing imbalance of trade between East and West</em><em>.</em>
Explanation:
<em>I </em><em>hope</em><em> it</em><em> will</em><em> help</em><em> you</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
<em>#</em><em>c</em><em>a</em><em>r</em><em>r</em><em>y</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>l</em><em>e</em><em>a</em><em>r</em><em>n</em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em>g</em>
Throughout the nineteenth century, the role of women began to change. ... The Industrial Revolution brought about the birth of two classes: The middle class ... Men were not just seen as the head of the household, but they were seen as the ... roles and expectations of women during this time period as a result of these shifts.
Criminology is the scientific study of the nature
Answer:
United Kingdom-cultural change
Explanation:
It was in this period that private life achieved a new prominence in British society. The very term “Victorianism,” perhaps the only “ism” in history attached to the name of a sovereign, not only became synonymous with a cluster of restraining moral attributes—character, duty, will, earnestness, hard work, respectable comportment and behaviour, and thrift—but also came to be strongly associated with a new version of private life. Victoria herself symbolized much of these new patterns of life, particularly through her married life with her husband, Albert, and—much later in her reign—through the early emergence of the phenomenon of the “royal family.” That private, conjugal life was played out on the public stage of the monarchy was only one of the contradictions marking the new privacy.
However, privacy was more apparent for the better-off in society than for the poor. Restrictions on privacy among the latter were apparent in what were by modern standards large households, in which space was often shared with those outside the immediate, conjugal family of the head of household, including relatives, servants, and lodgers. Privacy was also restricted by the small size of dwellings; for example, in Scotland in 1861, 26 percent of the population lived in single-room dwellings, 39 percent in two-room dwellings, and 57 percent lived more than two to a room. It was not until the 20th century that this situation changed dramatically. Nonetheless, differences within Britain were important, and flat living in a Glasgow tenement was very different from residence in a self-contained house characteristic of large parts of the north of England. This British kind of residential pattern as a whole was itself very different from continental Europe, and despite other differences between the classes, there were similarities among the British in terms of the house as the cradle of modern privacy. The suggestive term “social privacy” has been coined to describe the experience of domestic space prior to the intervention of the municipality and the state in the provision of housing, which occurred with increasing effect after mid-century. The older cellular structure of housing, evident in the tangle of courts and alleys in the old city centres, often with cellar habitations as well, resulted in the distinction between public and private taking extremely ambiguous form. In the municipal housing that was increasingly widespread after mid-century, this gave way to a more open layout in which single elements were connected to each other.
