<span>for that, what you need is a calculator... like say a TI(texas instruments) 83 or 83plus or higher, will do regressions, if you have an android device like a phone or tablet, you can also get an app from the play store "Andie's graph", is a TI calculator emulator, it works just like the calculator itself, you'd only need the ROM
</span><span>that said, you can also use some online calculators for that.
</span>
<span>I could give you a direct link to one, but this site has issues with links, if you do a quick search in google for "keisan exponential regression calculator", it should be the first link, is from the Casio site.
</span>
<span>you could do regressions in a spreadsheet as well.... you could check online for an "addin" or "extension", if you use MS Excel, pretty sure there are some addins for regressions.
</span>
if I recall correctly, Excel does regressions natively, but the addins are just frontends, is all, just some added interfacing.
anyhow, if you have an Android device Andie Graph works peachy, I have an 83plus, 84, 86 in it, they all work just like my old TI83plus.
there's also an app in the play store called Graph89, is an emulator for a TI89, the same you need a tiny little file, and texas instruments provides them, have also, works peachy too.
Answer:
The home printer is faster.
Step-by-step explanation:
25 photos in 12.5 minutes
12.5 is half of 25 and therefore this is a two to one ratio.
So 2 photos print in 1 minute with the office printer.
And 4 photos in 2 minutes(this is relevant later)
The home printer prints 15 photos in 6 minutes. Since 15 is not divisible by 6 without a remainder divide both by 3.
So 5 photos in 2 minutes. This is faster than the office printer.
To find how many photos it would print in 12 more minutes, simply multiply 15 by two, since the minutes(6) was multiplied by 2 to get 12. This leaves you with an answer of 30 photos in 12 minutes
<h2>Helloooo!!! Marie Here!!!</h2><h2 />
The answer is here:
<h3>
Hope This Helps! Have A GREAT Day!</h3>
2/3 x 21 is correct because 21 is bigger than 15
they deleted my answer and they wont tell me why- let me try again
<u><em>answer:</em></u> jacy would earn a total of $7,952,345,352 if he saved up for a total of 18 years.
<u><em>explanation:</em></u>
the total of seconds among 18 years: <em>568,024,668 seconds.</em>
we now take the 568,024,668 and multiply it by 14.
<em>our final answer is </em><em>$7,952,345,352.</em>
i dont know if this is a genuine question or not but here-
