3. It was thought to be an accident
4. Shansville, Pennsylvania
5. All of above
Answer:
The best statement which describe Javier's research question is:
O. It is specific but not too narrow, and is phrased to allow for an in-depth response.
Explanation:
From the question which was asked by Javier, we could see that, he asked a specific question in his question to obtain the positive or negative effect og life in Japan as a result of Treaty of San Francisco.
On the other-hand, it is not too narrow due to the fact that, the effect could range from education, to history or from military hardware to medical researches. <em>It is phrased to allow for in-depth response which would take up all the time in the history class while not providing opportunities for all students to contribute within the allocated time frame. </em>
Knapp’s model is interpreting all aspects of a relationship. You have to think about a relationship that corresponds or relates to the aspects, and how. For two, you have to find out which stage the relationship is in. Finally, for three you have to explain why it’s currently in this stage. I believe this is what they’re trying to ask.
Answer:
1. Louellen was standing near her locker...
2. Cynthia, a new girl in school, walked...
3. Louellen greeted Cynthia but then...
4. Louellen thought that she hadn't...
5. She turned around and...
6. Louellen introduced Cynthia to her friends.
