Answer:
(A). suddenly; gradually
Explanation:
A psychological or mental disorder is a condition that causes impaired mental behaviors and is characterized by unexpected cultural reactions to situations.
In <u>acute onset mental disorders, symptoms occur </u><u>suddenly</u><u>, while in insidious onset mental disorders, symptoms occur </u><u>gradually</u><u>.</u>
<span>The Toulmin argument attempts to persuade while stressing understanding and common ground. The Toulmin argument is an informal method or reasoning. There are steps, three parts to the process, that if you follow should bring great support to your argument. </span>
I put this as a answer bc im checking my quiz and bc so no body takes this bc i actually am doing k-12 right now
Answer:
"The Mississippian Period lasted from approximately 800 to 1540 CE. It’s called “Mississippian” because it began in the middle Mississippi River valley, between St. Louis and Vicksburg. However, there were other Mississippians as the culture spread across modern-day US. There were large Mississippian centers in Missouri, Ohio, and Oklahoma."
Explanation:
"The construction of large, truncated earthwork pyramid mounds, or platform mounds. Such mounds were usually square, rectangular, or occasionally circular. Structures (domestic houses, temples, burial buildings, or other) were usually constructed atop such mounds.
Maize-based agriculture. In most places, the development of Mississippian culture coincided with adoption of comparatively large-scale, intensive maize agriculture, which supported larger populations and craft specialization.
The adoption and use of riverine (or more rarely marine) shells as tempering agents in their shell tempered pottery.
Widespread trade networks extending as far west as the Rockies, north to the Great Lakes, south to the Gulf of Mexico, and east to the Atlantic Ocean."
Answer:
The correct answer would be, It lessens the chance that bias will affect the review process.
Explanation:
Grant proposal reviewers are people who review the proposal came to them to approve or reject a grant. They select the proposal on the basis of certain ground to approve the grant. If there comes a proposal, which conflicts with their interest, then it is better to get themselves removed from the review process, because if they do so, there are pretty fair chances that they become biased and can reject the grant on the basis of their own views. So if they get themselves separated from the review process, it would lessen the chance that bias will affect the review process.
