Answer:
The statement is: False.
Explanation:
In supply chain management, incremental analysis is in charge of determining the cost of ordering one more additional unit of a product over the cost of no requesting that additional unit. The cost of overstimulating demand is the loss of ordering one additional unit and discovering that it cannot be sold. The cost of underestimating demand is the opportunity loss for nor requesting one additional and discovering it could have been sold.
<em>The cost of underestimating demand is more difficult to determine than the cost of overestimating demand because underestimating demand because it involves customer's desires</em> on purchasing a product when not having the resources to do so.
Answer:
a. $0.30
Explanation:
Basic Earning Per Share (BEPS) = Earnings Attributable to Holders of Common Stock ÷ Weighted Average Number of Common Stock.
Earnings Attributable to Holders of Common Stock calculation :
Net income after tax for the period $160,000
Less Preference Dividend ($10,000)
Earnings Attributable to Holders of Common Stock $150,000
Weighted Average Number of Common Stock calculation :
Outstanding common shares 500,000
Therefore,
Basic Earning Per Share (BEPS) = $150,000 ÷ 500,000
= $0.30
Answer: $15,909.09
Explanation:
Nominal GDP is the value of goods and services that is calculated on the basis of current year prices whereas Real GDP is the value of goods and services that is determined on the basis of Base year prices. If we are using the identical price for both the years for calculating GDP then we can see the increment in the current year GDP from the last year. This means that the quantity of goods produced in the current year is larger than the last year. That's why it is important to use Real GDP rather than Nominal GDP.
Given that,
Nominal GDP (millions of dollars) = $14000
Price level (GDP deflator) = 88
Real GDP = 159.09 × 100
= $15,909.09
Hence, Real GDP = $15,909.09.
Therefore, Real GDP is greater than Nominal GDP hence we can say that the amount of good produced is worth more than $14,000.
Answer:
the times was interest earned in Year 3 is 11.2 times
Explanation:
The computation of the times interest earned ratio is given below:
The times interest earned ratio is
= (Net income+ Income tax expense+ Interest expense) ÷ Interest expense
= ($25,500 + $25,500 + $5,000) ÷ $5,000
= 11.2 times
Hence, the times was interest earned in Year 3 is 11.2 times
The same is to be relevant
Answer:
c. 2.30 years
Explanation:
In the payback, we analyze in how many years the invested amount is recovered. The computation is shown below:
In year 0 = $1,150 (Initial investment)
In year 1 = $500
In year 2 = $500
In year 3 = $500
If we sum the first 2 year cash inflows than it would be $1,000
Now we deduct the $1,000 from the $1,150 , so the amount would be $150 as if we added the fourth year cash inflow so the total amount exceed to the initial investment. So, we deduct it
And, the next year cash inflow is $500
So, the payback period equal to
= 2 years + ($150 ÷ $500)
= 2.30 years
In 2.30 yeas, the invested amount is recovered.
