Answer:C
Explanation:
Educated guess. Proper understanding of the environment helps to make informed decisions
It is to be noted that the following question below is about a Trial Balance. This is a type of reconciliation book in Financial Accounting.
<h3>What is a Trial Balance?</h3>
Please, note that the original worksheet is not attached, hence the general answer.
This, in financial accounting, refers to the statements or records of all credits and debits in a double-entry accounting book which includes all errors or disagreements between figures and accounts.
Usually, all debit and credit columns sums must and should be equal to show that the account has been balanced.
See the link below about Trial Balance:
brainly.com/question/24914390
The correct option is C.
The Taft Hartley Act is a United States federal law which limits the activities and powers of labour unions. The Act was enacted in 1947 and it prohibits some union practices, it also requires improvement in union disclosure of political and financial dealings. <span />
Answer:
27%
Explanation:
The actual rate being charge on these loans is the effective annual rate and the formula to calculate it is:
i=(1+(r/m))^m−1
i= effective annual rate
r= interest rate in decimal form=0.24
m=number of compounding periods per year= 52 (a year has 52 weeks).
i=(1+(0.24/52))^52-1
i=1.27-1
i=0.27
According to this, the answer is that the actual rate being charge on these loans is 27%.
Answer:
Explanation:
I will give a basic hint to understanding this problem
Prevailing technique or what is best known as "Dominant Strategy" is an activity profile that is best for a specific player review of what different players are picking. for this situation there is no prevailing procedure for any player on the grounds that there is no single activity profile that expands the result for any player.
So we can say from this observations that the following is valid;
- A doesn't have a dominant strategy
- B doesn't have a dominant strategy
There are two Nash equilibria for this situation. Both the organizations are charging a low cost and both the organizations are charging a significant expense.
As such they can augment their benefit given what the adversary is doing.
I hope this explains the observation seen.
cheers I hope this helps
