All categories

2 years ago

What are cons for "Every Student Succeeds Act"?

History

1 answer:

V125BC [204]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

The Every Student Succeeds Act was created originally to assist the students to continue having success even after high school graduation. This includes improving students' academic growth, and identification of gifted and talented students

However, there are various Cons of the Every Student Succeeds Act.

Some of which are:

1. Less attempt to determine the main cause of inequality

2. There are still hidden inequalities in the Every Student Succeeds Act.

3. There is the closure of schools in some areas.

4. Vulnerabilities of students persists where there is a school closure

5. Federal government appears sidelined.

You might be interested in

Where did most migrate to once they got to the United States?

mel-nik [20]

Ellis island
In New York

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The United States and Japan only looked like they were on friendly terms. What was causing conflict between the two countries?

bonufazy [111]

Answer:Pearl Harbor

Explanation:

The conflict between American and Japan started when a Japanese air fleet attacking an American naval base

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Hey guys can someone help me with my history pls just click on my pfp bc nobody is helping me and I really need help

Talja [164]

Yea what tha problem

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Plz help!!

Andreas93 [3]

Ford motors doubled workers pay and had equal pay for all races or gender as suppose to the present time. If only modern America can use this basic common mindset the bottom class will be no more. Therefore all Americans or most of will thrive. With better pay and also less hours of work the system will be a match for her neighbors like Canada

8 0

3 years ago

What were the differences between the two parties?

arsen [322]

Answer: The Democratic Republican Party and the Federalists

Explanation:

The Federalists wanted a strong federal government whereas the DRP defended states' rights.

They disagreed on central banking, Hamilton(Federalist) wanted to have a federal entity to control the issuing of money(a central bank) which Jefferson(DRP) strongly opposed since the power of the bankers to control monetary creation would endanger individual liberties.

They disagreed on their interpretation of the Constitution, someone like Marshall (Chief Justice of the USA, 1800-1835) defended a loose interpretation of the Constitution whereas Jefferson stood for a strict interpretation of the Constitution.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers