Answer:
The purpose of the discussion is to interpret and describe the significance of your findings in light of what was already known about the research problem being investigated, and to explain any new understanding or fresh insights about the problem after you've taken the findings into considerations.
Explanation: does this help?
First example: anecdote. The example suggests a narration, particularly through the words "outcome; left alone; etc". The situation also shows that either what preceeds or follows is a experience, that is an action.
Second opinion: expert opinion. This kind of supporting evidence is usually given by professionals, in this case a doctor. The word 'helpful' suggests it is an opinion rather than a fact.
Third example: fact. The use of the present simple tense and the fact that the information is specific shows that it is a fact.
Fourth example: emotional appeal. This kind of supporting evidence uses a variety of words full of emotion. In this example, emotional words include "pledge; striving; and vulnerable". The example appeals to emotions, which is the purpose of this type of evidence.
The proffesor will grade her paper by evaluating the criteria as listed on the rubric.
Phrase because it is saying a state
I would consider it a mood because it can change over time.
EX: You can be enthusiastic one moment, then sad the next.