Answer:
Option D, HFCs and HCFCs are less likely to deplete stratospheric ozone and contribute less to global warming than CFCs do
Explanation:
HFCs have the ability to replace CFCs. They are able to deplete the stratospheric ozone because they have chlorine. However, their ozone depletion potentials (ODPs) is quite less as compared to that of CFCs. HCFCs ozone depletion potentials (ODPs) is between 0.01 to 0.1 while that of CFCs is around 1. Hence, HCFCs deplete less stratospheric ozone and hence their contribution to global warming is comparatively low
Hence, option D is correct
Boiling water and something cooking in the oven
Hope This Helped!
Answer:
Both made products from other continents available to the peoples along the route.
Explanation:
This is true due to the fact that majority of goods and products from other continents passes through those routes. As it passes along, it is now possible for other people to be able to purchase such products thereby making it available for them.
This is a rhetorical strategy that strengthens the singer's argument.
<h3>What is rhetorical strategy?</h3>
- Words or phrases are used strategically to promote meaning.
- Word or phrases used to persuade readers.
- Words or phrases are used to further the author's goals.
By using a hypothetical example, Singer increases understanding of his argument. This is because it allows the audience to see the argument applied in a situation where anyone could be involved.
This makes the argument more understandable and can persuade the reader more easily.
For this reason, we can say that this example strengthens Singer's argument.
More information about rhetorical resources at the link:
brainly.com/question/25170004
